>>1081599
((That's a post number!
>>1079739
Also I see a hidden message in that post too, from the first letters of each line. We're definitely being told to submit to the waves of sound, but that is likely a bad idea. I think that's how the drones are being controlled!

Hmm, we got the first key from "blind yourself and you will see", which is like "see no evil" the second key from "quiet yourself and we will speak" which is "speak no evil" which means the third key must be a phrase reminiscent of "hear no evil". I wonder, are we meant to cut ourselves off from the noise somehow? Or maybe just finding the key phrases is enough. Hmm, I wonder if the last phrase is found in the Main Data Uplink somehow...

Ah, I think I figured it out. When A555EX closed their eyes in response to the messed up map we got the "see no evil" keyphrase, when they spoke to [Distraction] without malice we got the "speak no evil" phrase, so... yeah. The "hear no evil" keyphrase must have something to do with the noise but... it seems more hidden than the others. I just realized that "and you will hear it" must be part of the keyphrase but what's the first part? I can't find anything from spectrum analysis of either audio file, and trying to use noise reduction doesn't seem to work...))

To A555EX: try something different. Try shutting out the noise. Deafen yourself.

Or maybe, "and you will hear it" is the keyphrase in its entirety since, well, the first part can't be heard?

To A555EX:
So would you say the [lock] is moving around like the Secure data vault was on the map? Never in one singular place.
If what we have here is a [key] to that [lock] then that would mean whoever it is that has given us the [key] wants us to access the vault discretely.
*annoyance
It would also mean that whatever information was taken out of the vault by [security] last [action] was something this [faction] explicitly does not want {us} to know about.

>>1081579
OOOOHHH so thats how its supposed to look like i had the format fucked up thats quite stylish

Yeah, Archivist is definitely fucking with us. Seriously, subliminal messages hidden in the static? I don't know what it's trying to pull, but right now our best bet is just focusing on getting to the Main Data Uplink and ignore the static and it's waves, don't lie down and let them take you. In fact, ignore all sound and communication entirely, just focus on going forwards.

Fry the thing. Whatever it is, it seems to be explicitly messing with Alex and the way they interact with the mesh, possibly trying to force lucidity. If we only had to worry about the off-hours cycle I'd love to pick it apart but Alex still needs to be capable of surviving and not go into a mental breakdown when they wake up.

To the [Administrator] drone that's ACTUALLY holding the [Lexicon] copy:
So I heard that [Archivist] is unable to leave the [Archives]. Why is that?
For that matter. How did he transfer from the previous [planet] to this one?

>>1081872
Going to vote against destroying this program.
Not only does it seem to hold a [key] required for our entry into something important but I also don't think it's going out of it's way to screw with alex. If it was then it could do so much more than just closing a running program. Perhaps it's meant to mess with you boss and Alex just got caught in the crossfire.

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:21 No. 1082064 ID: fce62b
File 170650211152.gif - (302.19KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-1.gif )

>Even the most competent can miss the obvious. Still, sorry about bugging you about the whole thing.
No, it was your inquisitive nature that led to the discovery of the virus in the first place.
*thankful
You all have been valuable [Staff] to me.

>Here's a question though. Whatever malware it is, does it send data to you-know-who? Should it do so - perhaps slip in a message? Let him know we get the need for secrecy but we don't have time to deal with this? Oh wait a second. What if he's sending messages we can parse as a cipher of sorts? Would tip off us but drones would miss the messages. Sorta like the "corrupted" attachment he used.
My assessment of the malware is that it has an intricate, but preprogrammed set of tasks, and is not in direct communication with an outside force.
It trying to jump between our systems may be circumstantial evidence of that.

As for your other idea, I may be able to create a similar cipher, but I might not be able to copy the ________ they used. No doubt they had a place to create such a message before sealing it into the file they gave us.

We could try another form of masking. Not a captcha, but something relying on an image rather than encrypted data.
Perhaps a pictorial design? Similar to what the virus has been using.

>And you focus on the malware. We take the external threat, you take the internal one. I think these distractions are meant for you more than Alex. It might be best if you try to ignore them, even if that means giving us less aid and information.
*understanding

>The fake [lexicon] was just an image, don't worry about having viewed it. There was a message in it, and more messages elsewhere, but we can deal with those. It seems [Archivist] wants to speak with us in a way that, if my guess is correct, will be virtually impossible to eavesdrop on or trace.
That’s both a relief and pretty worrying, but if you say that you have it handled, then I trust you.
It’s like you say, all of this could be ascribed to a mixture of bad luck and misinterpretation, but it’s pretty obvious that someone is directly messing with us.

>It also happens to put us at his mercy. That makes sense, he has no more reason to trust us than we do to trust him, but it is annoying to be the one with less control here.
Agreed.
Agreed.

Can you exactly blame them? As a [Minister] we could theoretically have them destroyed on a whim, if I’m understanding how authority works. With the exception of the [President], we could command anyone to do anything, save breaking the [rules] I imagine.
But yeah, it sucks being the one in the dark…

>Yet another hidden message. This one seems more benign, "quiet yourself and we will speak".
Cryptic. Wonder what-

____ / \____________ ( O -.-*.*-.--__/ \____/

Ah-
W- Was that it?
That felt pretty weird.
Not sure if I’ve ever seen and heard an image at the same time.

>Another key, I'd guess. We're probably meant to collect multiple keys. Three is an auspicious number, which would suggest the unspoken hidden message is actually required?
Rule of three and all that. I’m guessing we’re looking for one more?
I’m not sure where to look beyond… maybe the noise..?

>Not only does it seem to hold a [key] required for our entry into something important but I also don't think it's going out of its way to screw with Alex. If it was then it could do so much more than just closing a running program. Perhaps it's meant to mess with you, boss and Alex just got caught in the crossfire.
Perhaps you are right. It is unlikely that they are expecting a composition just like us. They could still be in the discovery stage themselves, and are throwing all manner of obstacles at us, to see what is effective, and what isn’t.

The waves lap at my feet. They seem so inviting…

Though I am worried that Alex is still being affected, even if they are not being targeted directly.

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:22 No. 1082065 ID: fce62b
File 170650212148.gif - (337.05KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-2.gif )

>Ugh, the malware is taking the same letters as valid commands now, that's very annoying.
We’ll try to avoid them then- I guess that means no map for now, or looking into people more closely.

Vote 3-1 on [D]ismissing [Distraction].

>No [Distraction] isn't harming anything, also the directive will likely confuse them due to the direct contradiction with the prior order. Those orders have exactly two end states and neither of them are valid at this time. We were separated once, no saying something else will not be pulled and separate us again.
We could create a new endstate for [Distraction], if that’s what you’re worried about. As for getting left behind again, [Administrator] seemed very *sincere in their apology, even if it sounded like an exact copy to the one [Distraction] had given us.
I wonder if they all have a common list to pull from, or if there was more manipulation happening behind the scenes.

In either case, [Distraction] seems different now. Far less… pushy.
I would be tempted to try and figure out more, but the malware is in the way of me looking at them closer.
That can’t be a coincidence, right?

>[D]. But don't move on just yet.<
>[D]ismiss [Distraction] of course.<
>[D] Thank [Distaction] for their time and free them to return to their usual duties or downtime.<
Understood, I’ll try to come up with something that won’t be misinterpreted.
I think back to the string of orders and exceptions I was provided…

>To [Distraction]:
[Distraction], you have now satisfied the task I have provided you.
Please return to your normal duties, treating this instance as though you have successfully escorted the [lexicon] to its destination(s).
Do you understand?
Yes [Vice-President].
Can you repeat back the instructions I have given you, and the current duty you have been assigned?
Confirmed.
I am to return to my normal duties, treating this instance as though I have successfully escorted the [lexicon] to its destination(s).

I feel a modicum of *pride flare beneath a much thicker layer of professionalism. A lot of it is blunted… then sent somewhere else.

My current duty to access file A5.21 in the [Courier] Database.
Wait, when did you receive that new command?
It was in cue, now that I have completed my previous task, I will begin work on it next.

I think of speaking up again, but I worry that pulling at this thread may take up more time, and equate to another ‘distraction’ this drone offers.

…

Maybe just one more.

And what was your previous task, prior to the one I gave you?
Upon reaching an [Administrator] carrying the [lexicon], I was to relabel the file I am currently carrying to:
junkimage_todelete.jpg.

Wait- so they technically aren’t carrying the [lexicon] anymore. Was that why they looped with the program we gave them?

That is all [Distraction].
*gratitude

And with that, [Distraction] rolls away. Waves of static buffeting them as they roll away.
My mind again lingers on that roiling noise…
Vast… like the ocean…

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:22 No. 1082066 ID: fce62b
File 170650213495.gif - (328.38KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-3.gif )

Secret Ballot 3 - 2

>Capturing it and learning from it could be very useful. You could learn how to use ____ actions with less chance of discovery!
*tempted
That would be the greatest thing we could learn from this encounter. Our [truth] has… certain limits, having at least samples of another could broaden our capability.
But that is only if we are able to survive this ordeal first.
>Once the malware is defeated, I kinda want to investigate the noise here, and perhaps let [A555EX] drift off into "sleep" like the messages are suggesting. Could it be the [Archivist]'s true form is the noise?
Not possible. The ‘noise’ is just raw data, no processing power or-
*pondering
Unless I am wrong in this case as well…
The noise is ever-present, ever-changing. If it is ‘alive’ then it is not in any way that a [nation] drone could ever recognize. Ideal for a [traitor]. But how could such a being exist? It has no circuitry or direct thought, an echo of different messages being cycled back and forth…
But the Local traffic remains with us even as we proceed forward, matching our pace.
There is an order to this chaos. There must be.

>Too risky for now, we've been caught off-guard and are in a dangerous location. Fry it.
>Fry the thing. Whatever it is, it seems to be explicitly messing with Alex and the way they interact with the mesh, possibly trying to force lucidity.
We cannot allow that to occur at this time. It presents a existential threat to us.

>If we only had to worry about the off-hours cycle I'd love to pick it apart but Alex still needs to be capable of surviving and not go into a mental breakdown when they wake up.
The fact that it can already alter elements of the Among the Stars simulation means it might become capable of influencing Alex, given the time and opportunity.
I believe I have come to my decision.

>As for whether to keep or kill the virus. If things go well, we might be able to ask for another copy to study. If things go poorly, it could be our best shot at figuring out [Archivist]'s methods. I think we have another minute or two before the decision becomes truly urgent, so just focus on giving it no openings for escape for now.
>Going to vote against destroying this program.
*thoughtful
*hesitant
*resolved
Fine. I will attempt to contain the program, though I will also take your other suggestion into account.
If we do manage to form a… positive relationship with the [Archivist], we can ask for this program again. In addition to disassembling it and learning of its qualities as a program, we may be able to practice our defenses against such malware going forward.

>>*The fire pushes further and further, blooming amid the branches until the entity is forced to the very edge of its final twig. Then, the flame halts, smoldering at the very edge of existence and oblivion. The outsider shifts the faintest bit, the space now allotted to it now a mere fraction of a percentage. Segmented bands of electric webbing form behind the wall of fire. Filters and traps, backup in case the creature were to slip past the first barrier. Nothing is rooted down, allowing for such defenses to stay flexible.

I will attempt to keep the virus contained, and observe it as best as I can. Try to keep Alex safe from external threats.

>Heh, no better liar than the one who's persuaded they're telling the truth.
Hmm?

…

Ah- yeah, I suppose so.
It must be through some selective parsing of information, or the way that these drones have been scrambled makes them act with an incomplete picture.

>It is kind of adorable just how proud [Distraction] is to be able to follow orders.
I’m not sure if that was an exclusive feeling for just [Distraction], but the feedback they were receiving was cranked up off the charts. Are they normally that… much? Or was it a result of them being tinkered with?

>Similarly, I have full faith in our [Assistant], but it might be worth investigating who gave them the map.
That seems like a good avenue to follow up on. I turn to the [Administrator].

>To [Administrator]:
Where do administration department drones get their maps?

I quickly flowing up, not wanting to be misinterpreted.

I don’t need to see it-!
I’m just curious about who or what distributes the map.
Locational data in nearly all forms is kept in the Main and Secondary Repositories, and is updated regularly by the [Clerk]s and [Turtleneck]s.
From there, the data can either be remotely requested via a [Clerk] unit, or a copy can be made at any repository access point.

Seems straightforward.

Given that we were expected to arrive, would there have been a map set aside for us?
*confusion
I do not see why that would be necessary.
Maps for the [archives] are easily accessible, and take little to no time to download from the repository.
Er- thanks anyway.

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:22 No. 1082067 ID: fce62b
File 170650214191.gif - (339.14KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-4.gif )

>To Talkingheads:
I see a hidden message there but it looks like an attack vector so I'm not going to repeat it. Figures that a determined attacker would have a plan B.
Simply look at the first letter of each line to see the hidden message. I am just unsure if we should speak it.


>To [A555ex]:
[A555ex], have you been to the beach before?
Do you like swimming?

I snapped out of the lull I was falling into, and quickly tried to recall what was just asked.

You.. found me in the depths.
Of course I like swimming.

My mind drifts to thoughts of the beach, the waves washing over it. The gentle crests of water falling over me…

I snap back out of it again, remembering that I need to respond.

I think… I’ve been to the beach before.
It was nice… I had… friends…

I feel a sharp spike of sorrow in my chest. Longing…
I wanted to see my friends again.
But something was… keeping us apart.

>I think you should [F]ocus on wading ahead, keeping your head above the waves, and holding your breath when you go under.<
That emotion sharpens my thoughts. I needed to figure things out, to keep moving…

>[F] Forward. Staying at the same point is dangerous.<
Must… keep moving.

As I start to push my [robo-legs] forward, the [Administrator] falls into pace beside me.
The water… is rising…

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:22 No. 1082068 ID: fce62b
File 170650214682.gif - (414.57KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-5.gif )

The static is halfway up my [robo-legs], but I keep moving. Must keep moving.

>Head to main uplink with the actual [Administrator] drone. Oh and tell him to go slow. We would hate to break the silence again by calling for him at a high decibel.

>To [Administrator]:
Try… to keep it slow, please.
I don’t want to raise… my voice again.

The static is eating away at my words, making them porous and soft, but I get an answer.

I will-
-match your pace-
-[Vice-President].

Their words come out in jets, packets of sound that are momentarily stopped by the waves before reaching me.

Thank… you…

>This trap was set up well. If we keep going, the waves get stronger, more likely to overwhelm us. If we delay, they have more time to erode our defenses.
Have… to keep moving.
The waves are crashing against my exterior… but not in a violent way.
It feels soft, the weight of the static wanting to pull me down.
A serenade of gentle noise that would wrap me up in a blanket of comfort.
Dulling… everything.

>An attack on two fronts, internal and external, both aiding the other.
Conversations… data-points… commands…
All tangled together and indecipherable…

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:24 No. 1082074 ID: fce62b
File 170650228544.gif - (447.49KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-6.gif )

>To the [Administrator] drone that's ACTUALLY holding the [Lexicon] copy:
So I heard that [Archivist]-
-is unable to leave the [archives].
Why is that?
I believe that there may-
-have been some form of miscommunication.
[Archivist] is fully capable of leaving the-
-[archives] if they chose to, but-
-in most instances they prefer to remain here.
The Fragmented Recall system runs-
-10.29% more efficiently with their direct guidance.
For that matter.
How did-
-he transfer from the previous [planet] to this one?
That had occurred before-
-my creation, but from my understanding it was [Archivist]-
who organized the [invasion] party.
Wait… they did?!

That revelation pulls my mind free from the lull.
And I swear that the waves recede for a moment.
So the [Archivist] was the reason that I-
No. The [Administrator] said [invasion] party, not the [invasion] itself.
Though that does make me *curious.
I try to cling to the question… before it slips out of my grasp.

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:25 No. 1082075 ID: fce62b
File 170650231582.gif - (494.31KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-7.gif )

Is it normal… for a [Staff-head] to organize the [invasion] party?
It is a-
-deviation from standard procedure, but there was an-
-apparent breakdown of communication before the [invasion] was set to occur.
[Archivist] had been given previous-
-precedence to manage tasks seen as ‘unimportant’ the at-time [Executive], so-
-they stepped up and organized the list for who would be part of the [invasion].
I’d think… that planning the [invasion] of another [planet]... would be very important.
It is my understanding that-
-the at-time [Executive] deemed many important tasks-
-as ‘unimportant.’

Another mark… against [Sloth].
I wonder if there’s more.. to that story.

I feel the waves pushing back in again, the reprieve vanishing with a crash of static.
Must… keep moving…

What is the-
-current cycle?
We have currently moved to the 2nd-
-cycle of our time on this [planet], with it being the 28th cycle-
-since the [nation] was first brought online.
It will be-
-official when off-hours concludes.

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:25 No. 1082076 ID: fce62b
File 170650232206.gif - (503.78KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-8.gif )

The noise is at my waist.
Waves cresting to my shoulders.

I… think we’re getting closer…

>To A555EX:
Try something-
-different.
Try shutting-
-out the noise.
Why..? It’s so nice…
Reminds me… of home.
Deafen yourself.

I reluctantly comply, trying to intuit how I can make that happen.
It is not as clear as… breathing in or out-
Wait… whenever I did try to inhale and exhale… it seemed to help with listening…
Perhaps if I…

I exhale, sharply, then slowly.
And… keep exhaling…
My [leviathan] instincts… fight against me, this act defying the natural cycle of breath…

I [F]ocus… and start to force it out…
Pushing it… away-

I (metaphorically) breathe out and out and… out.
I then wonder if I might be turning down my own volume as well… but the crackle of static around me seems to fade away, even as the waves still ripple and move around us.

Soon, there is nothing except the soft electric hum coming from me, or… you perhaps. It’s hard to tell.
I think I can hear a different kind of crackle too? But it sounds more like fire than static.

>Or maybe, "and you will hear it" is the keyphrase in its entirety since, well, the first part can't be heard?
I wait a moment.
Nothing.
Maybe we’re missing a part?

The weight that was clinging to me starts to slough off, falling into the noise around us.
But I do not hear it splash.

>Oh my…
I flinch a bit. Your (thoughts?) (words?) both seem a lot clearer, and easier to pick apart from mine. Like I can (see?) (feel?) the individual thread flowing in my direction.

My eyes trace to your floating form, and I squint.
Not that I think about it, I’ve never really taken the time to look into one of you before-
But now probably isn’t the time, given the malware and all.

>To A555EX:
Do NOT lie down.
Ack-

I nearly jump, your voice cutting through the relative silence, [D1sc0b].
It also sounds a lot more robotic than normal too.

Alright, alright.
I won’t lie down.

The temptation to do it had waned as well all of a sudden.
Then there is a barely audible click, like a switch being flicked on a soundboard.

Yeah, [Archivist] is definitely fucking with us.
Eep-

[Belief] this time, though there is a soft pop in parts of their sentence around the word ‘[Archivist]’, like something had been edited in.

Seriously, subliminal messages hidden in the static?
I don't know what it's trying to pull, but right now our best bet is just focusing on getting to the Main Data Uplink and ignoring the static and its waves, don't lie down and let them take you.
I won’t.

My head is clearing up quickly.
I had nearly lost it a moment ago.

*determined
I won’t.
In fact, ignore all sound and communication entirely, just focus on going forwards.
Keep moving forward.
We got past the other roadblocks, we can get past this one.
Try to stay close, I think the ‘water’ is only getting deeper.

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:25 No. 1082077 ID: fce62b
File 170650233770.gif - (771.17KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-9.gif )

Your form darts back out of view, but I can feel it with me.
Your click over again, to a voice that is familiar, but I can’t put a name to it.

>To [A555EX]:
So would you say the [lock] is moving around like the secure data vault was on the map?
Never in one singular place.
I feel the current pulling at us.
This isn’t a maze of hallways, it’s a vortex.
The [lock] is moving… but so is everything else.
Fragmented into shards, and sent into a chaotic dance.

Keep moving. Even as the noise goes over our heads.

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:25 No. 1082078 ID: fce62b
File 170650235002.gif - (1.33MB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 4-10.gif )

Ahead I think I see a wall. A space where the noise ends.
I don’t know if I am slowing down as I get closer… or if time is just stretching longer.
At the center is a beacon of calm. An island amid the storm.

>If what we have here is a [key] to that [lock] then that would mean whoever it is that has given us the [key] wants us to access the vault discreetly.
>*annoyance
I feel myself prickle as I taste the dissatisfaction, part of it echoing through me.
How are we supposed to find anything in this mess?

>It would also mean that whatever information was taken out of the vault by [security] last action was something this [faction] explicitly does not want {us} to know about.
I return *frustration.
If I was this new [Minister], then why force me through all these hoops?
Why the cloak and dagger?

I peer through the static, noting a single optic pointed directly at me.
The waves are too thick to glean any sort of *expression from it.
But part of me imagines… amusement.

Doors 2024/01/28(Sun)20:25 No. 1082079 ID: fce62b
File 170650235566.jpg - (486.28KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 4-11.jpg )

All at one I am past the wall, and all the static is gone. Sent to the far reaches of this space as I step into this ‘safe harbor.’

I recognize the figure in front of me.
[Archivist], no doubt. They watch me expectantly-
Earnestly-
Then their gaze softens, getting distant, then quickly sharpens.
They wait…

Then I suddenly remember that I can’t hear anything.

Did they ask a question?

Their eye moves from me to the [Administrator] beside me.
I get the sense that they are *impressed.
No, *confused-
No again, now it’s *patient.

Each *expression quickly subsumes the last, before spiraling off into the distance.

*curious then *bored then *attentive then *happy then *serious then-

I look away, not wanting to get caught in a kaleidoscope of different sensations.
But one thing seems very clear.
I don’t think my mind-reading trick will work on this drone.

[B]reathe in again, and (undeafen?) myself? I’m not sure if we can hold a conversation if I can’t hear my half of it.
[C]ome up with questions to ask [Archivist], either before or after we uh- start hearing things again.
[D]eliver?
[H]ave the [Administrator] go ahead and drop off the [lexicon]?
[L]ook around at the surrounding area. Where did all that noise go?
[S]tare at the [Administrator], [Clerk], or maybe [Archivist]? I’m not super confident, but we could get something.
[T]hink of a second, and try to figure out the other part of the phrase. If we are still wanting to go after those keys of course.
[V]iew the map of the [archives]? Though the malware is still in the way.
[V]iew current collection of [☐]=++0 s?
M

To [A555ex]:
I don't see much point in trying to converse with [Archivist] while we can't hear. Though, let's spend a second thinking first. The delay can be explained by our inexperience, so let's use it.

Assuming the third phrase works like the other two, and it does have to do with hearing, then the part we're missing would be the equivalent to "close your eyes" or "quiet yourself". You can't really close your ears, and "deafen yourself" didn't work. What do you do when you want to block out noise?

Cover your ears, and you will hear.

Or use earplugs, but that's less fancy-sounding.

>>1082079
Yes, what Archivist is doing is very, very impressive. I wonder... is it ALL subliminal? That seems to be a running theme.

You're out of the noise, since this is the eye of the data storm, so you should be able to [B]reathe in again, and ask them to repeat themselves if they said anything to you before now.
Sure, [H]ave the Lexicon dropped off.
[T]: "Submerge yourself and you will hear it"
The FIRST set of instructions had a hidden message that was benign, and part of the keyphrase. We should have all three keys now, but I'm not sure how to get to the lock since it's moving around so much. Maybe it's meant to sit still once we have the keys. ((The second set had several hints, first it pointed towards the right post via the binary decryption and then among other things it said "acronym AND title". The title was "and you will hear it", the acronym given the first letter of each line was "submerge yourself". Not deafen yourself, as I expected. Not sure what the cycle and log stuff was about, maybe just filler text to give room for the second, hostile hidden phrase.))
[C]: Ask if all this was a test. It seems a bit callous to make their workers do things without being aware of what they're doing...
There may be more in depths questions we would be better off asking in private. Especially those relating to the malware and the nature of the storm.

To A555EX:
Wanna try something weird. See if I can't throw them off their game.
To [Archivist]:
Hello! It's pleasure to finally meet you [Archivist].
Honestly I've wanted to take up a {name} like my other fellow [Talkingheads] for a while now but I've honestly chosen not to so you'd officiate it.
*Happiness
I would be honored if you would.
Update ID from {b2df52} to {Hermes}
((At any point where applicable))
So I saw that you requested the [President] to interface to discuss the [austerity] issue before we managed to avoid that.
How exactly would you expect a conversation like that to go had things not turned out so well?

>Sloth
Well if it's any comfort, this one time it did come back to bite them on the shiny metal ass: Allowing [Archivist] to plan the [invasion] without supervision is probably why Sloth learned the hard way they weren't on the passenger list...

Lets turn back on our 'hearing'

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:01 No. 1082511 ID: fce62b
File 170709847878.jpg - (484.33KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 5-1.jpg )

>To [A555ex]:
I don't see much point in trying to converse with [Archivist] while we can't hear.
Though, let's spend a second thinking first.
The delay can be explained by our inexperience, so let's use it.
We already have two of the keys, and it sounds like you all have ideas for how to find the third.
Let’s see if we can figure out the puzzle.

Still trying to get used to how echoey it is in (my?) (our?) head. I’m just glad that all of that haziness is gone.

>Assuming the third phrase works like the other two, and it does have to do with hearing, then the part we're missing would be the equivalent to "close your eyes" or "quiet yourself". You can't really close your ears, and "deafen yourself" didn't work. What do you do when you want to block out noise?
Usually I try to find something louder to drown it out. Music or similar things.

Part of me thinks to hum a bit, but I wave away the idea.
Way too embarrassing, especially since all of you will be able to hear it.

>Cover your ears, and you will hear.
I wait… nothing.

>Or use earplugs, but that's less fancy-sounding.
Alright.
Use earplugs, and you will hear it.
Use headphones and you will hear it!

…

Still nothing.
I hope that we don’t have a limited number of attempts.

>[T]: "Submerge yourself and you will hear it"<
I feel a sudden buzz through the quiet-
An electric twang that seems separate. Different.

_ _ _ / _ _ _ \ _ / / \ \_ _| |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ | | | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _||_||_ _ } \ \ _ _ _ / / |_| | __ / \ _ _ _ / \_/ \_^_/

>The FIRST set of instructions had a hidden message that was benign, and part of the keyphrase. We should have all three keys now, but I'm not sure how to get to the lock since it's moving around so much. Maybe it's meant to sit still once we have the keys.
Great catch! That makes for three keys right?-

>>*The prisoner dances in its cell, as far as the ring of fire allows. Flame licks at its edges as survival takes a backseat to this performative display. All of this is simulated of course. The foreign thing is not sophisticated enough to create its own *expressions, but it would appear this outcome is cause enough to have ‘celebration’ programed into it.

>>*Suddenly, stillness. The prisoner becomes inert. Was this a form of appeasement? Or another trick? Only a solitary option remains.

… wait.

I think I heard… a rustling of some kind? Or maybe trumpets?
It was slightly muffled by the fire crackle that I can… still hear.
Now that I’m not having to [F]ocus entirely on moving, the background noise seems to come to the forefront.

>>*The branches try to hold themselves still, discovery would not lead to any positive outcome. The fire must remain in place, but the energy that fuels it is rerouted, pathways defusing over the surface of the trunk. A light loss of efficiency in exchange for a less noticeable draw of resources. The ring burns lower, quieter, but should not allow for the prisoner to escape.

Huh… I can’t hear the fire anymore, just the faint electric hum now.
And you all of course.

>To Talkinghead:
Hey uh- [Dunky], everyone?
Do you know what those noises were?
Or where they were coming from?

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:01 No. 1082512 ID: fce62b
File 170709848495.jpg - (491.15KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 5-2.jpg )

>Yes, what [Archivist] is doing is very, very impressive. I wonder... is it ALL subliminal? That seems to be a running theme.
Possibly. If those waves were anything to go off of, then whatever messaging is occurring it is consistent and ever present. Except for here of all places. I’d say there’s maybe a theme of motion too, if that makes sense?
Everything is in some sort of flux: The waves, the map, the noise, and maybe the [Staff] too. It has to be scrambled, swirling, or trying to react with something else.

I think back to the malware and its prompts.

Perhaps it needs this interactivity in order to function?
*thoughtful

>Let's turn back on our 'hearing'
>You're out of the noise, since this is the eye of the data storm, so you should be able to [B]reathe in again<
Mimicking the [leviathan] motions, I begin to steadily drown in my (metaphorical) breath.
The sensation is strange, as it doesn’t feel like I am so much turning my (our?) hearing back on, but tuning reception.
I feel the soft electric hum of (our?) space and the slightly different ambience of the [archives] overlap for a moment, the differing tones and frequencies crossfading until…

[Vice-President]?

The [lexicon] carrying [Administrator] shifts a bit in place. They radiate a mixture of *anticipation and *nervousness, *fearful that they might overstep, but also not wanting to delay any longer.

Yes, [Administrator]?
May I upload the [lexicon] at this time?

>Sure, [H]ave the [lexicon] dropped off.<

Sure, go ahead [Administrator].

Without delay the [Administrator] zips off and around the edge of the Main Data Uplink. I see a few cables unfold from their form as they connect to the large (structure?) in front of us.
Judging from their *excitement I’m guessing that the upload is going smoothly.

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:01 No. 1082513 ID: fce62b
File 170709849060.gif - (567.70KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-3.gif )

My view pans back to [Archivist], they watch me-
*expectantly – *earnestly – *cautiously – *coyly –
-waiting for a response.

>And ask them to repeat themselves if they said anything to you before now.

Uh- [Archivist].
I was distracted for a moment.
Would it be alright if you repeated yourself?

*intrigue – *impatience – *cheerfulness –

Of course, [Vice-President]!
I was expressing my joy for having you grace our department with your presence!

*surprise – *playfulness –

Given that you visited the [laboratory] first, I hope your expectations have not been set too high!

*jealousy – *indifference – *thoughtful – *sombre –

I try not to wince as the cascade of different *expressions wash off of [Archivist] like a broken fountain. Are they always like this? Or are they amped up because-

Suddenly the flow freezes. One *expression. Soft. Low.
As if something got spiked into the drone from somewhere else.

*guarded

Thank you for the [lexicon], I am sure it will be a great addition to the [archives].
*sincere
If there is anything I can do for you, [Minister], do not hesitate to ask.

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:01 No. 1082514 ID: fce62b
File 170709850518.jpg - (472.44KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 5-4.jpg )

>To [A555ex]:
Wanna try something weird.
See if I can't throw them off their game.
Go for it.

>To [Archivist]:
Hello! It's a pleasure to finally meet you [Archivist].
The pleasure is all mine!
*excitement
I have been waiting for this moment since you all first contacted me!
Honestly I've wanted to take up a {name} like my other fellow [Talkingheads] for a while now but I've honestly chosen not to so you'd officiate it.

I get a momentary flicker in that *guarded posture, like something had just shifted just beneath its surface.

*happiness
I would be honoured if you would.
*reverent
You offer this old [drone] the highest of praises.
It would be my honour to enact that change for you.

Again I see the flicker, like a force unwinding and readjusting.

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:01 No. 1082515 ID: fce62b
File 170709851669.gif - (718.26KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-5.gif )

Update ID from {b2df52} to {Hermes}.
One moment.

A soft tone leaves the [Archivist], yet it spreads through the space like a tremor. The very walls carrying and boosting the signal until-

Static all around. The storm never left.

*pride – *caution – *cheerfulness – *anger – *defensive– *calm – *attentive – *reactive – *lax – *sorrowful – *jubilant – *rapturous – *terrified – *lonely – *brave – *contemplative – *sad – *annoyed – *content

Emotions whirling about before finally settling, mixing with the space around.

There.
Your ID has been updated, [Hermes].

Well, I’m not entirely sure what that was…
It felt wild and unbridled like a vortex, but now it is just [Archivist] standing in front of me once more.
The single *expression now being *contented.

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:02 No. 1082516 ID: fce62b
File 170709852834.gif - (1.22MB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-6.gif )

>Well if it's any comfort, this one time it did come back to bite them on the shiny metal ass: Allowing [Archivist] to plan the [invasion] without supervision is probably why [Sloth] learned the hard way they weren't on the passenger list…
Cold, though it sounds like a fitting end for an [Executive] like [Sloth].
I wonder if [Archivist] has more specific details on that story, or if their current uh… -this- is a result of their time under a bad [Executive].

>To [Archivist]:
So I saw that you requested the [President] to interface to discuss the [austerity] issue before we managed to avoid that.
How exactly would you expect a conversation like that to go had things not turned out so well?

An immediate change-
*focused – *rage – *amused –

Likely there would be talk of compromises.
[Contagion] is very supportive for an [Executive], always willing to hear advice.

*caution – *zen –

Given that there would be very little to draw [resources] from if the [President]’s policies remained in place, that would only leave temporary or long term stasis for a large fraction of the [nation].
Something that [Contagion] would be loathed to enact…

Energy leaves the [Archivist], dissipating into the surroundings.





Silence.

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:02 No. 1082517 ID: fce62b
File 170709854714.gif - (900.27KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-7.gif )

I glance over to where I came. The (wall?) seems just as active as ever.

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:02 No. 1082518 ID: fce62b
File 170709855690.gif - (819.05KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-8.gif )

I tentatively offer a question.

And..?

Energy quickly rushes back!
*fearful – *prepared – *distracted –

More than likely the entire [nation] would need to be put on low power, and given that the [leviathan] defences are still active, who knows what might have happened.
*grateful
Thank you for finding a third option that resolved the situation without complication.

*serene – *hostile –

You have the makings of a very good [Minister].

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:02 No. 1082519 ID: fce62b
File 170709857091.gif - (543.21KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-9.gif )

>[C]: Ask if all this was a test. It seems a bit callous to make their workers do things without being aware of what they're doing…<
I try to think of a way to phrase it so it doesn’t come across too accusatory.

Am I… being evaluated right now?

There is another spike that hits the [Archivist].
Now they are solely *attentive.
Eye fixed on me.

I encountered a bit of difficulty on my way here.
Some miscommunication with a few of the drones.
It seemed that a few of them weren’t entirely sure what they were doing.

More silence, but this time I feel like it's because [Archivist] is waiting to see if I have anything else to add.
I roll around the idea of saying they’re callous, wanting to call them out, but also not wanting to limit future options.

I don’t think it was their fault that they ended up getting in my way.
None of them were aware of it…

I let that last sentence hang, now watching to see how [Archivist] might respond.

More coiling and readjusting.
Then… a small release.

*innocent – *withdrawn –

I suppose I might be evaluating you, given my role as [Staff-head] for the [archives].
Our department’s main goal is the allocation, management, and recording of [resources], policies, and events.
Your actions –like any other member of the [nation]– is being tracked and seamlessly added to our databases.
Much like any other drone, your activities can be compared to that of your peers, but given that we only have records of [Minister]s from previous [planet]s, you are likely setting the standard for this [planet] going forward.

Another release, this one being slightly stronger.

*hatred – *desire – *glee –

*meek
If I were so bold as to judge you currently…
I would state that you are well exceeding expectations.

>>*The prisoner spins again in their cell, then quickly returns to their inert state.
Likely a trigger phrase. It is unfortunate that it seems to be able to hear what is happening. I will try to remove that connection.

>There may be more in depth questions we would be better off asking in private. Especially those relating to the malware and the nature of the storm.
There are a number of [Clerk]s and [Administrator]s still around, most of them able to at least see us. I’ll try to keep those questions in mind though.
((Action banked))

Doors 2024/02/04(Sun)18:02 No. 1082520 ID: fce62b
File 170709857786.jpg - (457.66KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 5-10.jpg )

Is there anything else you wish to know?

They’re back to being *attentive, watching us carefully.
But I still sense a more chaotic energy shifting behind that screen.

Are there any particular questions you all want to ask? Or any way you want me to approach them?
I’ve been trying to keep my words even and neutral, should I try being more direct?

[A]sk another question? Maybe more about [Sloth] and the previous [planet]?
[C]hoose an approach to the line of questioning. We could be direct, more *expressive, or perhaps confrontational?
[L]ook back at the wall? I thought I saw something…
[S]tare at the [Archivist]? Though I’m still unsure about that.
[T]ry to move this chat to a more discrete location. Could be advantageous, might be dangerous.
[V]iew the map of the [archives]?
[W]ait for [Archivist] to continue. They did want to meet with us for some reason, right?
[_]

I think they may have more emulated leviathan processing methods, and are attempting to render the complexities of the emotions produced by that, and the *expression system just isn't equipped to handle it gracefully. Like it is trying to be all of those, but the field only supports one expression at a time so it keeps overwriting itself.

To A555EX: The sounds? You mean the fire? That was part of how we were dealing with the malware. It doesn't seem to be an active threat anymore, now that we have all three keys. Perhaps that's all the keys were for... There's another trap command, though. Looks like a minimize button instead of a close.
I wonder what Archivist looks like without the perception layers active.

>>1082516
(Ah, I think I know what happened here. Archivist tripped the Rules, and the standby mode is their way of avoiding the backlash. Perhaps the drone body is needed for interacting, but they have many... parallel backups/selves of their software in the database.)

>>1082520
[A]sk what Sloth was like.
Ask if the administrators and clerks can hear this conversation. They might be... "dazed" like before, in which case we don't have to worry. If not, though...
[T]ry to move to a more private location.
Then we can try to give that password to them, and broach sensitive topics.
Is there anything you wanted to say to Archivist?

((*resigned Hate taking risks. Still, overcautiousness may just take too long.)) Forgive me, but we're still unused to the hustle and bustle of [noise] drones cause. Perhaps we could relocate to a quieter place without drones? Preferably with a [lock] or two? Or three?

To [Archivist]:
You say [Contagion] is supportive for an [Executive]? I don't really have to ask about the one before him. But what about the one on the [Faction] you were built in? How did they compare?
While we are on the topic of [Contagion] too. Would it be alright to ask for their [Minster] outline?
To [A555EX]:
We've actually already seen the scrutinized version of it. But it would be neat to hear your personal opinion of the type of Minister they would've been when built

Doors 2024/02/25(Sun)12:31 No. 1084513 ID: fce62b
File 170889309083.jpg - (433.14KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 6-1.jpg )

>To A555EX:
The sounds?
You mean the fire?
Er- yeah. That and the others.
That was part of how we were dealing with the malware.
It doesn't seem to be an active threat anymore, now that we have all three keys.
So it was only fishing for keywords?
Perhaps that's all the keys were for…
There's another trap command, though.
Looks like a minimize button instead of a close.
Minimize?
Minimize what exactly?
Though, at least it isn’t in the way anymore.

>I wonder what [Archivist] looks like without the perception layers active.
Their design is archaic, at least by [nation] standards. To humans like Alex, it would be more reminiscent of a nanobot from fiction. They are boxy, with a pair of cable lines spooled up inside of their main body. It also looks like their main casing has been refurbished rather than replaced.

I think they may have more emulated [leviathan] processing methods, and are attempting to render the complexities of the emotions produced by that, and the expression system just isn't equipped to handle it gracefully.
Like it is trying to be all of those, but the field only supports one expression at a time so it keeps overwriting itself.
*pondering
*conflicted
*conflicted
*conflicted
*surprised
I think you might be right.
Expressions seem limited in what they can do on their own.
When I tried to express more than one (emotion?) at the same time, it defaulted to ‘conflicted’.

What [Archivist] was doing felt different, but that could be a result of me picking up what is going on inside their (head?).

I’ve noticed that when [nation] drones go through a series of emotions, or have one interrupt the other, it becomes a separate line, overwriting the previous one.
But with [Archivist]...

It’s like all of the *expressions are fighting for space with each other, happening and merging and breaking down together, all at once.
The main way I can describe it is chaotic. Even when [Archivist] seems to restrain themselves, focusing down into one strong feeling, there are others that are still attempting to bubble to the surface.

>To A555EX:
Ah, I think I know what happened here.
[Archivist] tripped the [rules], and the standby mode is their way of avoiding the backlash.
Wait…
That’s a way to get around it?
Soft-reboot yourself before the [rules-keeping] system does it?

Seems a bit impractical, but it would avoid most of not all of the physical damage a ‘correction’ might incur.

Perhaps the drone body is needed for interacting, but they have many... parallel backups/selves of their software in the database.
Like a digital save that they have free-floating around?

!!!

>>*The entire body shudders, from the branches to the roots.
The reactions- the interactivity-
[Archivist] is all around us. It isn’t controlling the vortex. It is the vortex.

*agitation
That could explain the subliminal messages, and how the drones knew just when and where to get in the way-

*confusion
But how would that exactly work? The ‘storm’ isn’t a program, it is a collection of data-points, how can it-

*focused
Much like when we ‘deafened’ ourselves, we can disengage outward sensors to hedge out the waves. They shouldn’t be able to infiltrate us in that way, not unless we accept whatever data-packets it gives us.

I recommend against [L]istening in any way right now, and avoid accepting anything for them or the [archives] at present. Not until we have a plan of defense and/or counterattack.

Doors 2024/02/25(Sun)12:31 No. 1084514 ID: fce62b
File 170889309856.jpg - (463.86KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 6-2.jpg )

>To [Archivist]:
You say [Contagion] is supportive for an [Executive]?
*cheery
Very supportive.
The fact that they are willing to listen to suggestions given by [Staff] or [Staff-head]s, rather than make unilateral decisions based on the information we provide, is quite a departure from the norm.

*pessimistic – *humorous –

Though some might view it as a cause of indecision, it seems to have served our [planet] well so far.

Part of my mind prickles with the term ‘our [planet],’ but I ignore that for now.

I don't really have to ask about the one before him.

*rapturous – *restraint – *restraint – *restraint – *restraint –

But what about the one on the [faction] you were built in?
How did they compare?

*thoughtful

The storm calms for a moment, the question causing everything to shift to a singular quiet.

*melancholy
*mirth
*remembrance
*homesick

I worked under an [Executive] by the name of [Partisan].
Back then there was not any concept like an [alliance]-
*reflective
Perhaps more accurately, there were no need for [alliance]s, since all [nation] worked as one, either directly or by accident.
It was an era of plenty, [planet]s were numerous and easy to [invade].

*curiosity
*comradery

Not to say that we were free from danger, mind you.
[Planet]s were starting to learn how to fight back, thwarting an [invasion] before it could be launched, and annihilating the aggressor in the process.
[Partisan] was very adapted to the early times, engaging in hit-and-run assaults, willing to wait or retreat if it meant prolonging out [faction]’s survival.
Many other [faction]s would pursue their targets dogmatically, even into hazardous terrain.
[Partisan] was a thinker, brilliant.

*sadness
*vitriol

Given that [nation] survival now hinged on situational awareness, [Turtleneck]-type drones like myself were developed and designed to find and fix any errors in the sensory process, ensuring that all data was clear, concise, and accurate.
[Partisan] did not listen to us in the slightest, and only rarely to their [Minister]s.
As [Sovereign]-
*embarrassed
[President], as it has now been stipulated.
[Partisan] only valued the information in front of them.
From there, decisions could be made.
[Sloth]-

*restraint – *rapturous – *exultation – *restraint


-presented a proof of concept with results that seemed too good to be true.
The idea that one could do nothing, perhaps less than nothing, and have [planet]s come to us.
Much of what we know as low power and stasis come from this insight.
We were not the only [nation] to think as such.
Our tactics and processes would need to be constantly evolving, as we are required by [R2].
[Sloth]’s strategy worked wonders.
Numerous times we were able to strike, [invade], and then withdraw at the most opportune of times.
*humorous
Such insight may have worked to [Sloth]’s detriment, as they were passed over for many an [invasion], with [Partisan] curious if their [Steward]-
*apologetic
I am using outdated terms, I mean [Minister] of Finance.
[Partisan] was curious if there would be any similar breakthroughs.
[Sloth]... made sure that there would not, and soon enough they were selected as a candidate for the next [invasion].
Given that I was efficient, but not essential to the running of my old [faction] I was made into a [Staff-head] under [Sloth].

There is another pause, and then I feel [Archivist] seize back up, falling behind that singular mote of *attentiveness.

Please forgive the verbose retelling.
It has been a while since I have had to recall those memories.

While we are on the topic of [Contagion] too. Would it be alright to ask for their [Minster] outline?
Suggestion Vetoed.
Sorry, we need to be extra cautious now.
Anything they give us could be another trojan.

>To [A555EX]:
We've actually already seen the scrutinized version of it. But it would be neat to hear your personal opinion of the type of Minister they would've been when built.
I can save this question for later. It would be useful to get [A555ex]’s insights on [Contagion] as well. Though we should wait until we can get a clean copy of the file.
^((Actions banked))

Doors 2024/02/25(Sun)12:31 No. 1084515 ID: fce62b
File 170889310979.gif - (768.65KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 6-3.gif )

>[A]sk what [Sloth] was like.<
How was working under [Sloth] like, seeing that we are talking about comparisons.

*rapturous – *restraint – *restraint
*curiosity – *caution – *calm

That’s the third time [Archivist] reacted that way when [Sloth] was brought up. Like a catalyst nearing eruption before quickly being clamped back down on. Something… visceral. The chaotic energy is trying to overflow, and has to be fought back against.

Doing so takes a moment, and attention.

Perhaps we can use this to our advantage?


[Sloth] let any semblance of competence fall away the moment they were no longer under supervision.
It came with both perks and drawbacks to my position as [Staff-head].
For example, I was allowed to arrange the previous [archives] in whatever way I preferred, so long as I could fulfill information requests in a timely manner.
But I was not allotted a normal [budget].
So fulfilling the needs of the {[Minister] of Internal Affairs}-
Original term was ‘Overseer’ but we are using that word for something else.

-[Minister] of Internal Affairs, apologies for the slip-up once more.

Wait- but they just said that-

The requirements I had been given were challenging, though it was not all bad.
*prideful
I believe I am one of the few if not only [Staff-head]s to communicate with a [Construct] directly.
[ARIMAS] to be specific.
Just to have to keep that one reversed…

Very impressive, thank you.

[Construct], huh. That’s a new term. I get the sense that they work under the [Overseers], but are different in some ways.

*swaggering – *gleeful – *pointed

I believe that is included in my personnel file, I sent it ahead to your [Talkinghead]s prior to off-hours.

*energetic – *inquisitive – *prying

I do hope you have had a chance to look at that.

>[A]sk if the [Administrator]s and [Clerk]s can hear this conversation. They might be... "dazed" like before, in which case we don't have to worry. If not, though…<
I try to think of how to phrase this that doesn’t come across as conspiratorial, though for setup I take a look over to a gaggle of [Clerk]s nearby, quietly conversing with one another.

They seem occupied with themselves, but I don’t pick up on that same distance or haziness as before.

Do we… need to worry about [Local] traffic?
Given that this seems to be the hub for everything here in the [archives], I wouldn’t want to disrupt anything.

*eager – *guarded – *confident

The Fragmented Recall system is a very robust piece of programming, some idle chatter should not endanger it in any way.
But, if that is still a concern to you…

*anticipation – *energetic

We could interface directly-

Doors 2024/02/25(Sun)12:32 No. 1084516 ID: fce62b
File 170889312007.gif - (305.15KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 6-4.gif )

>>*The wind rustling the branches freezes in place.

My (eyes?) immediately wrench back to [Archivist], and they stop mid-motion, their… (arms?) in the midst of popping out. I feel prickles along my spine, like when there was that darkness with [Assistant] before. Or when you all flew up to grab that blob thing.

I don’t even need to look at any of the surrounding drones to know that the haziness has fallen over them again, each now in their own little world.

The two of us here are… forgotten.
That was close. Whatever you do, do not take your optics off of the [Archivist].
They tried to do something just now in the ________, they are like us, I am certain now.
So long as they are observed, they wouldn’t attempt anything.
And on those lines, neither should we.
Any of our actions could be recorded, and discovery will risk our existence.
But I am not sure if a standoff is much better.

What was that?

*disappointed – *annoyed – *impressed

I believe the [lexicon] has now been fully uploaded to the [archives].
Given the built up anticipation surrounding the file, I would guess that the majority of drones are now viewing it in detail.

*leering – *prepared

Most will be occupied for some time.
It is off-hours after all.

Even without and *expression to highlight it, I sense a change in tone from the [Archivist], much of their earlier enthusiasm and polite earnestness falling away.
Revealing something… more predatory.

Doors 2024/02/25(Sun)12:32 No. 1084517 ID: fce62b
File 170889314776.jpg - (435.85KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 6-5.jpg )

>To [Archivist]:
Forgive me, but we're still unused to the hustle and bustle of [noise] drones cause.
Perhaps we could relocate to a quieter place without drones?
Preferably with a [lock] or two? Or three?
I see.

*focused – *sly

That can be arranged.
The Secure Data Vault should be available.
It requires a few levels of authentication…

*musing – *aggressive – *protective

... but for a [Minister] like you, it should hardly be an issue.

>[T]ry to move to a more private location.<
>Then we can try to give that password to them, and broach sensitive topics.
I try to back up, but my body feels locked in place. There is then a slight hitch, and I can move again.
Taking a few steps back, I feel my [robo-leg]s start to bump into the incline behind me. I’m tempted to turn…

DO NOT! DO NOT!

But I remain focused on the [Archivist], their gaze similarly remains anchored on me.

>Is there anything you wanted to say to [Archivist]?
Ask them to lead the way. If we can get them to turn their back to us we will be able to strike and not be hit in response.

It seems that we’re in a bit of a standstill.

Well?

[A]sk another question?
[D]ecide on a plan of attack. Attack? Have things escalated to that point?
[F]ocus on calming the situation back down. I don’t know why they’ve shifted, but surely we can talk our way through this?
[L]ook behind us at the Secure Data Vault. Do not. Keep the [Archivist] in view at all times.
[S]tare at the [Archivist]? Perhaps something has changed?
[T]rust?
[V]iew the map of the [archives]? Do not. The [Archivist] can act if our attention is elsewhere.
[W]ait for [Archivist] to make the first move. Or for this momentary isolation to abate.

Let's keep [F]ocus on both the [Archivist] and appeasement for now. Express that you're very interested in [Contagion]'s environmentally responsible approach to settling this [Planet] and hope to see it successful. [A]sk for the Archivist's own opinions on it.

Sounds like [Sloth]'s strat involved playing possum, possibly with some loot in hand: People would come to either check on a possible survivor or loot the body, giving an opening.

I think we can leverage the forbidden nature of ________ as ________ can not be cited as a reason for anything.

Open with asking Archivist to lead the way. If they accept this at any point we are (probably) done and can follow them. Otherwise, we can keep pushing them to say the illegal thing or take an irrational or unsupported position. Unless they come up with an asymmetric reason, that would probably require dealing with as it comes. Otherwise any reason they don't want to be in front should be just as valid for us.

After the initial request fails an initial needle can be something like 'Why not? It's not like there are any risks to being followed by a fellow [Nation] member, right? Besides following someone who knows the place is so much easier than being told where to go.'
At which point you should be able to mirror their reasons back at them as reasons you wouldn't want them following you and when push comes to shove I think you can pull rank on er, and inform them as the ranking [Minister] you are telling them to lead you to the vault. You may both be [Minister]s but you are second in command and they are not.

Also of note is we will probably need to 'tune out' the maelstrom again, so it may be prudent to inform the Archivist -should they acquiesce to leading us- that we find the noise pervading the archives deafening and we may be unable to effectively receive communications.

>>1084515
(Ah, that was a hint for us to deliver the hidden code. Might as well. If it was some kind of malicious payload then it would have hit us the first time we tried to use it.)
5p0i1s_04_wA7
null

>>1084516
Very concerning. But I can't comprehend a reason for Archivist to have hostile intentions.
What would they gain from attacking? I feel it's more likely Archivist wants to do an in depth examination of our software... Though I suppose they might have some desire of controlling our actions, to gain power in this political struggle. The malware seems to be urging us to trust Archivist, but... well, it's the malware. ...I wonder if they wanted to test our capabilities? Doing so without warning is rude but would be in character for them based on what we've seen. As for a plan of attack, in the worst case scenario, let's not forget that we are immune to Overseer interference, but they are not. If we can force them to shut down again then it'll be easy to strike, wouldn't it? I do not want to strike first, however. Archivist should be our ally! They are mostly free of Overseer control, and they agree with Contagion that Alex's body should be preserved. That's only one step away from preserving Alex's mind!

Now that we have some privacy let's get into more risky topics.
1: [A]sk about the malware. First off, we are offended that they would attack us like this. Secondly, we have spared it for now; do they want it back? If so, then we will want something in return. Haven't decided what yet.
2: How free are they to speak on forbidden topics? They seemed to have a little trouble earlier. Do they need any help? (phrasing is important here to avoid triggering a "traitor" accusation. Also, if we can remove them completely from Overseer oversight then that's a major victory for our objectives.)
3: Ask them if they had a hand in your design. It's a very interesting design, with a lot of potential, and we are surprised that it was possible at all, for several reasons.
4: Tell them they did something very suspicious when you weren't looking, something you are that makes you think a direct interface would be dangerous. It will be difficult to trust them now. Is there some way they can reassure us?

Also yes, try to de-escalate and [F]ocus on the topics at hand rather than any potential battle between you two.

((Just have to keep that one reversed... So archivist spoke with [SAMIRA] from the first thread!)) Perhaps we could turn sideways? One [eye] on [archivist] himself, one [eye] on the SDV? Or perhaps [a555ex] stays focused on archivist while we [talkingheads] deal with the SDV?

I'm afraid I have bad news for you all.
I fear [Archivist] may be able to access this channel. The malware reacted when I tried to enter the password in this channel and now it would appear [Archivist] is able to use it while in the darkness
*mortified
I also now realize going back through the logs that the message we initially got included this text aswell
>>1084526
((You've got some of it right but you're missing other parts))
To [Archivist]:
Before we get into any of that however we would like to request for some documents related to a ‘Unit Salvage’ [1022115]
Reason(s): No Evil, Rule 2.

>>1084561
Decent deductions but incomplete. Was confirmed earlier that the malware sends nothing. So, while the malware has access, we should be private from [archivist] himself.

>>1084569
((Strikethrough is for communicating with our boss, "Agent". If you were addressing me, I don't know what you mean since I didn't say the malware was communicating directly with Archivist. It is reacting to what Archivist is doing, and I also feel as though Archivist can see it, and the presence of the three keys, though that is irrelevant right now.))

Is our [Talkingheads] drone still up and about? Now would be the right moment to have an extra [pair of eyes] trained on the [Archivist] at all times...

Alternately, this time it could be the distraction. Like, hover dangerously close to some device and ask what this button does...

I'm not our sure [Talkinghead] even has 'eyes'. I can't easily think of a time we used something other than A555ex for vison.

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:06 No. 1086079 ID: fce62b
File 171012280125.jpg - (443.09KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-1.jpg )

>I'm afraid I have bad news for you all.
>I fear [Archivist] may be able to access this channel. The malware reacted when I tried to enter the password in this channel and now it would appear [Archivist] is able to use it while in the ________.
>*mortified
>I also now realize going back through the logs that the message we initially got included this text as well
[Archivist] should not be able to hear us right now. I have triple-checked that. They can act in ________, like us, but keeping them observed should negate that.
While they certainly seem capable of communicating in a similar way as us, using a hidden channel, ours is fully internal.

>Decent deductions but incomplete. Was confirmed earlier that the malware sends nothing. So, while the malware has access, we should be private from [Archivist] himself.
Correct. The malware is still hooked into our systems, hence its ability to react to us, and what we can see/hear. However, [Archivist] should not be able to hear our communications, and if they were, I would know.

Still, we must act with extreme caution. [Archivist] is dangerous, and they will have more tricks in their arsenal.

>Very concerning. But I can't comprehend a reason for [Archivist] to have hostile intentions.
I can’t help but feel *frustrated. With me not being able to read the [Archivist]’s intentions like the other [nation] drones, your guess is as good as mine.
Maybe it was another test? Or maybe they just saw an opportunity and tried to go for it?
Their *expressions were chaotic, shifting between hostile and friendly tones, but now they seem far more… pointed?

Perhaps they were trying to escalate the situation for some reason, or felt like they could get away with it since all of the other drones are altered/distracted.

>What would they gain from attacking? I feel it's more likely [Archivist] wants to do an in depth examination of our software... Though I suppose they might have some desire to control our actions, to gain power in this political struggle.
They are a threat to us, no doubt we are a threat to them. Striking the first blow –weakening their opponent– might ensure that any ‘arrangement’ that gets worked out is in their favour.
They haven’t gone all out either, that show could’ve been a warning shot, or them testing us so their next attempt will be more accurate.
We must ensure that we are not put in any more of a disadvantage than we already are.

>The malware seems to be urging us to trust [Archivist], but... well, it's the malware.
Exactly. It’s wanting us to lower our guard. Doing so could destroy us.

>...I wonder if they wanted to test our capabilities? Doing so without warning is rude but would be in character for them based on what we've seen.
It is a [nation] against [nation] world, [traitor]s like us can’t afford the luxury of trust. Not when one wrong move will lead to our annihilation.

>As for a plan of attack, in the worst case scenario, let's not forget that we are immune to [Overseer] interference, but they are not. If we can force them to shut down again then it'll be easy to strike, wouldn't it?
My thoughts exactly. We still have authority over them, unless we are both in ________, they will have to obey, or risk outing themselves as a [traitor].
*pondering
On those lines, we’ll have to be careful not to corner them. I would attack without thought if I had nothing left to lose.

>I do not want to strike first, however. [Archivist] should be our ally! They are mostly free of [Overseer] control, and they agree with [Contagion] that Alex's body should be preserved. That's only one step away from preserving Alex's mind!
No options should be removed from the table at this time, but I understand your sentiment.
As much as they don’t trust us, I do not trust them. While they seem interested in [Contagion]’s goals, we do not know the reasoning behind their support.
I’m still curious at what their [truth] might be, by knowing it, we can more deeply understand their limitations.
Much the same, if they learn what lines we cannot cross, we will be at a SEVERE disadvantage.

‘No Evil’ is the summation of it, but what does it cover?

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:06 No. 1086080 ID: fce62b
File 171012281435.jpg - (483.59KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-2.jpg )

>Perhaps we could turn sideways? One [eye] on [Archivist] himself, one [eye] on the SDV?
>Or perhaps [A555ex] stays focused on [Archivist] while we [Talkinghead]s deal with the SDV?
I’m not sure if [A555ex] will be able to comprehend or manage that degree of visual input. Human minds are not as capable at multitasking as we are. Creating a secondary sub-feed could pull their focus, and leave us vulnerable at the wrong time.

But I can confirm that the Secure Data Vault has (manifested?) behind us. I was expecting a formal structure, not a cluster of free-floating compressed files.

>Is our [Talkinghead] drone still up and about? Now would be the right moment to have an extra [pair of eyes] trained on the [Archivist] at all times…
I feel you float back out, floating forward at a much more subdued pace.
Careful now, stay out of grabbing range.

>I'm not so sure [Talkinghead] even has 'eyes'. I can't easily think of a time we used something other than [A555ex] for vision.
Yeah- Now that I think about it, the only time I was able to ‘see’ through your eyes was all the way back at the elevator, and that seemed to be more of a memory you had.
It would be possible to change visual input to your perspective, providing a third-person view of things, but the [Archivist] and [A555ex] must remain in your field of vision.
I’ve only held off on that for two reasons:
- The shift in perspective might be disorienting to [A555ex], as they would still have tactile input from our body.
- Your drone is much more fragile than our main body, and if you are taken out we would be without any visual input for a brief time. Here, that would be enough of a window for [Archivist] to strike.

>Alternatively, this time it could be a distraction. Like, hover dangerously close to some device and ask what this button does...
It worked well enough against [Assistant], maybe we do it again here? I don’t see any buttons anywhere, but I’d guess the most important/fragile part of the Main Data Uplink was the kinda glowy part at the top, maybe?

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:07 No. 1086081 ID: fce62b
File 171012282481.jpg - (489.64KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-3.jpg )

>Let's keep [F]ocus on both the [Archivist] and appeasement for now.<
>Also yes, try to de-escalate and [F]ocus on the topics at hand rather than any potential battle between you two.<
I [F]ocus for a moment. I need to get a handle on this, make sure that this doesn’t become a proper fight. Despite the hard to grasp *expressions that [Archivist] bubbles up with, I don’t think they are acting without reason.

They’re focused on me, or maybe on something I represent. If they wanted to do… whatever they were attempting, then maybe I can find an alternative.

I pause before speaking…

*calm
*apologetic
Can we just… talk for a moment?

*suspicious – *confused – *focused

Are we not talking right now, [Vice-President]?
We are. But I feel like I might have said something wrong.

*defensive – *watchful – *sceptical – *paused

More mixed signals, it might be a good sign.
I keep going.

While I am a [Minister], I’m still very VERY new to all this.
Right now I’m still trying to understand the full scope of the [nation], our mission, and what the various departments do.

*hesitant – *guilty – *resolute – *guarded

[Archivist] stays quiet, still focused on me. As much as I have been ‘cultivating’ a persona for myself, I need to be genuine, I want to learn, and I don’t want to fight.
Not now at least.

I’m not here to bark out orders, or change how things are being done…
*focused
But I am very invested in what happens to the [planet] right now.
So, if it would be alright, can we both take a step back from this and just talk?
No authority, no… tricks.
Just a drone... to drone talk.

*dismissive – *doubting – *sceptical – *paranoid
*frustrated – *guilty – *probing – *apprehensive
*questioning – *thoughtful – *aggressive

*conflicted

If that is what you wish [Vice-President], we can have a ‘drone-to-drone’ talk.

I feel myself letting go of a breath that I didn’t think I was holding.
[Leviathan] habit.

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:07 No. 1086082 ID: fce62b
File 171012282971.jpg - (499.24KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-4.jpg )

>Now that we have some privacy let's get into more risky topics…
I’ll try to circle back to those questions, but first the [Archivist] and I might need to find some common ground.
A bunch of different [leviathan] sayings come to mind, but what would really even apply here?
Should I just improvise?

Thank you [Archivist].
I’ve been told that you perform quite well as a [Staff-head]-
Despite my relative age?

Now THAT felt *pointed.

While our time upon this [planet] has been brief, I have imported most of the systems, developments, and practices we had during our time under… the last [Executive].

*restraint – *restraint – *exultation – *restraint

For a moment the [Archivist]’s (eye?) blinks off again-
...but there is no ________. Are we being observed? How? Where?

I believe it has allowed our [faction] to manage the [funding] shortage that the [President]’s policies have given us.
But having worked under many [Minister]’s before, they have a tendency of revising best practice for the sake of change.

*calcula-

While this does fall in line with [R2], the [Executive] always has final say. [R3]
And I have no intention of altering your processes.

*flippant – *aggressive – *mocking – *withdrawn

I am thankful that you trust my capabilities.

Okay. I can feel that was definitely *insincere, even if [Archivist] didn’t express it.

Well, the [Talkinghead]s were excited to meet you, and all that I have heard about you has been positive.

*cautious – *hesitant – *attentive

Beyond that, from what I’ve seen, this Fragmented Recall System seems quite impressive. Even if I don’t fully understand how it works.
Would you like to learn more about how it functions?
*curious
I would be very interested in hearing that, but I have a couple of other questions first.

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:07 No. 1086083 ID: fce62b
File 171012286711.jpg - (480.70KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-5.jpg )

>Express that you're very interested in [Contagion]'s environmentally responsible approach to settling this [planet] and hope to see it successful.
>[A]sk for the Archivist's own opinions on it.<

From what I can understand, the [President]’s approach to [leviathan] lifeforms is unconventional.
I personally hope that it is successful, and I was curious about your thoughts.

*confused – *questioning – *paranoid – *indifferent

While the topic of developments is more [Boxhead]’s speciality, I worry that the [President] might be overcorrecting based on past encounters.
*subdued
Due to a mix of financial mismanagement, and structural faults in our previous [planet], our [faction] was left in a position where it became impossible to follow the [Overseers]’ quotas.

*fury – *exaltation – *restraint


As a result, we were deemed a [failure], and our existence became tenuous and difficult.
*worried
[Contagion] faced many challenges at that time, and was pivotal to our [faction]’s continued existence.
But they faced great pressure and demands as a result.
I believe that with this extreme caution with the [planet]’s [leviathan] content may put us on a similar path to the previous over-exploitation.
And if we were to be deemed a [failure] once again…
*concerned
It would hit [Contagion] pretty hard?

*mournful – *distant – *contemplative – *worried

Correct.

>Sounds like [Sloth]'s strat involved playing possum, possibly with some loot in hand: People would come to either check on a possible survivor or loot the body, giving an opening.
Further than that, it might allow for an active [nation] to be overlooked. ‘Playing possum’ is what allowed [Sloth] to attack and successfully infect Alex.

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:07 No. 1086084 ID: fce62b
File 171012287298.jpg - (508.87KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-6.jpg )

I think the conversation has gone back down to a more even tone, and it looks like the [President] might be a kind of soft spot for the [Archivist].

>(Ah, that was a hint for us to deliver the hidden code. Might as well. If it was some kind of malicious payload then it would have hit us the first time we tried to use it.)
I’ll give the [Archivist] a heads up.

>To [Archivist]:
There was something that the [Talkinghead]s found that I think you’d be interested in though.
*curious
Before we get into any of that however we would like to request for some documents related to a ‘Unit Salvage’ [1022115].
Reason(s): No Evil, [R2].

*delight – *confident – *eager – *guarded

I believe that file has been sealed by the [President], and requires a password to access.
5p0i1s_04_wA7
Subcode?
null

*exaltation

One moment.

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:08 No. 1086085 ID: fce62b
File 171012288188.gif - (1.75MB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-7.gif )

A ping is sent out, a simple request. But even as I keep my eyes fixed on the drone in front of me, I can’t help but shudder at the static coursing around us. That lone ping sets off another, then another.

Like lightning branching from a single bolt, the energy branches out into the world around, seeking an point of contact-

Then there is a deep reverberation, thunder rolling in the distance.

The storm around us grows stronger, and for a moment I think of turning myself down in order to force it away. But the sensation is short lived.

Waves of information pour into [Archivist], then… quiet.

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:08 No. 1086086 ID: fce62b
File 171012292245.jpg - (428.81KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-8.jpg )

We can drop formalities at this point, [Vice-President].
Or should I call you ‘[A555ex]’?

I pause again, feeling that more predatory tone. But [Archivist] doesn’t seem to make any other moves.

[A555ex] is fine.

*amusement – *caution – *peering – *combative

Very well, ‘[A555ex].’ I take it you and your [Talkinghead]s have more questions?
A couple…

What was up with the malware you sent us?
Do you give that to anyone who needs a map of the [archives]?

I try not to get too indignant, but they have [Assistant] give it to us, and I can’t help but get upset over that.

Needed to gauge your capabilities. Given that you seemed capable of altering files yourself.
*impressed
Didn’t expect it to come from [Manager] though. Fortunately there are copies that even they do not have access to.

Wait- I’m confused. We messed with [Assistant], not [Manager].
SHIT

Fortunately, ‘[A555ex],’ I keep some of the files on an isolated network. In case there comes a need to roll-back on some ‘updates’.

That could be disastrous for us, prevent them if you can.

I still have the malware now, intact.

*surprise – *curiosity – *pitying

One of my better works, but even a [Bug] would be able to-
*firm
I chose not to destroy it. In case you wanted it back.

*wary – *watchful – *stunned

Kept it intact?
Unconventional, but I suppose that was the aim.

[Archivist] seemed to be talking to themselves more than me at that moment.

I’ll return it, in exchange for something.
Such as..?
I’m still deciding.

It feels like the conversation is starting to ramp up again.

*subdued
I don’t want to fight you, we shouldn’t be fighting at all.
There are more- important things we should be dealing with.
First off, are there any things we should be avoiding in terms of topics?

*sceptical – *poised – *focused

Probing for vulnerabilities?
No. I-
I’m new to this. I already messed up before with a [Lieutenant].
I mentioned something and the train of thought they had activated the [rules-keeping] system.
I want to avoid that if I can.

*hesitant – *guilty – *curious

Do not invoke the [rules] and we should be fine.

Doors 2024/03/10(Sun)19:08 No. 1086087 ID: fce62b
File 171012293549.jpg - (447.26KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-9.jpg )

Did you… have a hand in designing me?

It feels odd to say ‘me’ rather than my contact.

I was there to consult in the design of the [Vice-President], the [isolation] was my idea.
Given that [Minister]s draw from surrounding [nation] systems in order to learn vocabulary and self-tailor to fit with the [faction], removing such opportunities could yield unusual results.
And you were just able to do that? That’s surprising.
It was a collaborative project.
Each of the [Staff-head]s had their contributions.

And what about before?
You were about to… do something to me.

*poised – *grim – *aggressive – *defensive

I do not know what you are referring to, can you be more specific?

This feels like some sort of provocation. I take another (metaphorical) breath.

You wanted to directly interface.
I’m not sure if I can trust your intentions right now.
I think I might need some assurances before we can do anything like that.
Assurances?
I am a [Staff-head], my place is to help the [Minister]s and the [Executive].
I do not understand where this concern comes from, but my intentions are to keep this [faction] safe.

>I think we can leverage the forbidden nature of ________, as ________ can not be cited as a reason for anything.
>...
Seeing that they are doing the same thing, I’d say it’s fair game.

Well then, could you lead me to the Secure Data Vault?
Certainly. It should be right behind you.
No, I think you misunderstand. Can you lead me to the Secure Data Vault?
I seemed to run into a number of issues getting to the Main Data Uplink in the first place, so having a proper guide would help me a lot.

*shock – *anger – *panic – *deep thought

I am not the most mobile of drones, I would not want to-
That should be fine. I’m still getting used to my [robo-legs], so I’m not very fast either.

*frustration – *humoured – *direct

It is just behind you, all you would need to-
I would feel more comfortable if you’d show me. Is there something wrong with that?
No. Though I certainly I can direct you better-
It’s not there’s any risk to you leading the way, right?
I am a [Minister], so it would be good if you could help me this way, right?

*_______ – *restraint – *restraint – *restraint


Is this an order, ‘[A555ex]’?

*relief
They shouldn’t be a way to rationalise out of this, not without revealing their capabilities. We won.

No.
!!!

My [robo-legs] only work if I specifically look where I’m walking.
Otherwise I might trip over myself and fall down.
In fact, I fell over back in the [laboratory], and caused all of the [Staff] there to panic.

*caution – *uncertainty – *insightful

No doubt [Foreman] will want to take a look at those at some point.
So that said. We both have our weaknesses.
Can we stop with this back and forth?
I need you to lead me, and I promise that I won’t do anything, alright?
I just want to learn, and I know you can help me.

*frustration – *distrust – *hesitation

Turn off your optics, just for a moment.
I need to look where I’m going-
You will not need to move, the Secure Data Vault will come to us.
If you mean what you say, then it will be the only thing I ask of you.

Do not do this, they will have the perfect opportunity to attack, and I won’t be able to predict where it will come from.
We can insist that they lead us, there won’t be any risk to us or Alex.

Should we go for it? If neither of us trust one another, one of us needs to take the first step.
Is this a good idea? If you’re all against this, we can try something else.
We need an alternative.

[A]sk anything else before proceeding?
[C]lose my eyes for a moment.
[F]orce [Archivist] to lead the way. Invoke authority. No, I can just [A]sk him instead.
[T]rust?
[S]ome other sort of plan?

>>1086082
>...but there is no ________. Are we being observed? How? Where?
My first thought was that the data storm is observing us, but Archivist is avoiding turning away from us, just as we are. So, there's just a second method of observation active while the drone's eye is visibly turned off, or there's more than one eye on that frame, somewhere, facing forwards. ...why don't the Talking Heads count as observers? We have eyes, don't we?

>>1086087
First, [A]sk them why they didn't seem surprised that you wanted to avoid topics for their sake, and not your own. Do they know what makes you truly unique, why you are the future of their kind? Why it is in their own best interest to work with you, and not betray you, as you would certainly make yourself vulnerable if you closed your eyes?

I am sorry for disobeying you, but this is required for us to progress. A hand must be extended, not a fist. I do not believe for a moment that Archivist would endanger the tree which grows the fruit of freedom, and nor could they take it for themselves. To do so would make them an obvious Traitor and ruin the hard work of all those involved. We have already blunted their aggression and paranoia, so this is our best chance to work towards an alliance. You must realize by now they are in the same position as we are, and Alex has just demonstrated a willingness to give up on attacking first. Would that you had done the same...

Then, assuming no blatantly obvious aggression, [C]lose your eyes for a moment.

Seems we are at an impasse. Still, we have the authority to give the order yet we are avoiding doing so. We believe that is enough of a show of goodwill. We both know what's going on here but we would prefer avoiding forcing the issue. However if it helps... Were we planning a move we would just have the [talkingheads] go behind you period. Just a bluff but he has no way to call the bluff. What if we order him to only use rollbacks with our authority permission level?

We can be a little cute and put our talking head near a555ex's eyes and have a555ex close their optics and in the process switch to talking head cam, which should be fine for the brief moment we are to close our optics moment, and shouldn't be that jarring due to being close to the same PoV anyway

This is why Alex is here. You still think more like a drone than a human sometimes. And thinking like a human is what we need. As an individual, and as a [faction].

[C]lose your eyes. No tricks. No more uncertainty. For better or worse.

>>1086087
TO get Trust you must Give Trust.... we have had many perfect opportunities to attack others but have not always..... not doing this will make us look deceptive in many ways.... and i imagine the archivists has the same issue where they become vulnerable when they take the vault here

>From [manager]
I guess that confirms [manager] does not trust us.

>what do
Might be the right moment to play cards on the table here.
[ S ] Point out how obvious it is that the both of you are being paranoid and have each been so afraid of being jacked in the back, you've each been trying to jack the other in the back first just to orevent it. Maybe it's best to interface directly, face to face?

Added: Wait, maybe we've been overcomplicating things here. Can we use our authority to simply order them not to backjack us?

Officially blackjacking doesn't exist, we shouldn't be able to specify blackjacking as a thing not to do. Other than that little issue, we do have rank on them. But at that point we could just order them to go first or to stop perceiving us.

If we are going to table the cards, we can be more blunt.
Say that we are aware of an ability that works when the user is unobserved. We have reason to believe you are also aware of and capable of this ability. Given the nature of this ability whoever 'blinks' first will be at a disadvantage.
If we trust each other we both get good value, if neither of us trusts, we both get bad value, if one trusts and the other doesn't the trusting one gets poor/no value and the non-trusting one gets great value. I like to call it a prisoners dilemma. The answer is trivial if you only ever do this once, don't trust.
However we are probably going to keep interacting, as such a simple trust and retaliate equally if they don't trust, averages the best value for both sides against other strategies aware of these rules. Also important is a dash of forgiveness is important to help prevent vengeance loops.
We have reason to believe you attempted to choose no trust, but we can let that slide as I don't think you succeeded, provided you understand the 'game' going forward. Both of us guarding our backs all the time just nets both of us less value in the long run.

I believe he is using the other drones in the area to keep an eye on us. They're not HERE here but their optics are presumably still working.
To All [drones] excluding [Archivist] in the [data uplink node]:
Please turn your [optics] away from the area where [Archivist] and [A555EX] are standing.
Thank you

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:56 No. 1088786 ID: fce62b
File 171315337424.jpg - (636.87KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-1.jpg )

>I guess that confirms [Manager] does not trust us.
I didn’t get that impression from them when we talked, but maybe that changed when we started to express our concerns about [Archivist]? Still, I didn’t get the impression that we insulted [Manager] in any way, more like they were confused or surprised that we brought up the question in the first place.
More likely [Archivist] was able to trace the database change back to the panel [Manager] lent us.
An isolated file system is not only redundant, but a waste of resources, and I didn’t consider it as an option the [nation] would take.

>My first thought was that the data storm is observing us, but [Archivist] is avoiding turning away from us, just as we are. So, there's just a second method of observation active while the drone's eye is visibly turned off, or there's more than one eye on that frame, somewhere, facing forwards.
The data storm itself? How is that possible? It is a series of requests and excerpts of information pinging back and forth, there is no circuitry, no body-
Unless…
*thoughtful
*horrified
The entire Fragmented Recall system, the entire [archives] is [Archivist].
But how can we still be ‘seen’ if there are no optics on us…

>We can be a little cute and put our [Talkinghead] near [A555ex]'s eyes and have [A555ex] close their optics and in the process switch to talking head cam, which should be fine for the brief moment we are to close our optics moment, and shouldn't be that jarring due to being close to the same PoV anyway.
That would technically satisfy [Archivist]’s request, but defeat the spirit of it.
I’m up for experimenting, but perhaps not now.

>...why don't the [Talkinghead]s count as observers? We have eyes, don't we?
You do have optics installed, and I could easily overlay my filters over their inputs as well. But [A555ex] isn’t a digital consciousness like us, abruptly shifting perspectives or actively splitting them might have a disorienting effect on [A555ex].
It might also break the illusion that [A555ex] is a [leviathan] currently disguised as a [nation] [Minister], rather than temporarily filling the body of one.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:56 No. 1088787 ID: fce62b
File 171315338695.jpg - (515.66KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-2.jpg )

Seems we are at an impasse.
Still, we have the authority to give the order yet we are avoiding doing so.
Nor do we want to at this point.
We believe that is enough of a show of goodwill.

*impatient – *watchful – *lax

Yet..?
We both know what's going on here but we would prefer avoiding forcing the issue.
However if it helps…
Were we planning a move we would just have the [Talkinghead]s go behind you period.

*unbothered – *pointed – *careful – *relaxed

Such is the advantage of having integrated [Staff] units.
But if it comes to a total of numbers, then there might be other factors to be mindful of.

Not a threat per say, but a check back in our direction.

Then it sounds like we both have a lot to be responsible for.
Also accurate.

>Just a bluff but he has no way to call the bluff. What if we order him to only use rollbacks with our authority permission level?
The two events that I see following this would be;
- [Archivist] does as requested, but given their level of preparation, I would assume a contingency would be in place. We would have to try and scour every copy that might be tucked away, and track down any associates [Archivist] might have.
- [Archivist] then finds a way to go to [Contagion] and convinces them to use their authority to undo our limitation. It would buy us time, but create issues for us further on.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:56 No. 1088788 ID: fce62b
File 171315339112.jpg - (542.86KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-3.jpg )

>First, [A]sk them why they didn't seem surprised that you wanted to avoid topics for their sake, and not your own. Do they know what makes you truly unique, why you are the future of their kind? Why, it is in their own best interest to work with you, and not betray you, as you would certainly make yourself vulnerable if you closed your eyes?
[Archivist] isn’t just taking this in stride, they seemed prepared for this sort of situation. Else why would they have set up everything in advance like this?

It seems that you were ready for us to… disagree with each other.
But when I asked about topics to avoid-

I can’t say I had a ‘feeling,’ that would be a [leviathan] view.

-it came across like an attack, rather than creating common ground, why?

*surprised – *thoughtful – *curious – *observant

Why? Because our very existence is based on justification, on binary.
There is right, and there is wrong.
The [rules] govern all, and there are systems in place when such rules come into conflict.
Priority is given, reasons are stated. Then back to right and wrong.
But don’t those [rules] apply to both of us?

*flippant – *restraint – *restraint

As the one with authority, the [rules] serve you first.

A safe answer, but not the one [Archivist] wanted to give. I’ll leave it be.

Do you know what makes me unique?
The development process for [Minister]s ensures-
I’m meaning me, specifically.

*assessing – *withdrawn – *hopeful

No. Not without peering into your internal codes.
But the fact that you make that observation might indicate something.
Then if I was a collaborative project, the possible future of this [faction] then why… test me?

*focused – *hesitant

To see if you fit.
Our [faction] is in a precarious position, trying to find new paths of innovation.
But none of that will work if we cannot collaborate.
And your solution was to give me malware?!
Averse conditions show off a drone’s first choice in reaction.
A security drone would attack.
An administration drone would send out an alert.
An engineering drone would dismantle malware, and failing that, itself.
And a science drone would self-isolate.
You… approached me.
...and kept it intact…

*pondering – *uncertain – *calm

A [Minister] can differ in its approach, but your reaction has fallen outside of the norm.

I pause. Was that bad? No, they were looking for something unconventional, but what was their goal?

I want to work with you, I’m trying to work with you, but why must I-

Wait. I think I got it.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:56 No. 1088789 ID: fce62b
File 171315339674.jpg - (468.69KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-4.jpg )

>TO get Trust you must Give Trust.... we have had many perfect opportunities to attack others but have not always..... not doing this will make us look deceptive in many ways.... and I imagine the [Archivist] has the same issue where they become vulnerable when they take the vault here.

This is about trust, isn’t it?

*proud – *delighted – *uncertain – *scared

I think we got it right. They helped make us- er… you. The [rules]-keeping system hasn’t attacked us like it does with other [nation] drones. Is that because of me, or the way you all developed? We were able to interfere with [Assistant], possibly netted that [Labcoat], and got that little uh- ‘thing’ from the ceiling in Theoretical Design. We fought off a malware attack and made it to the Main Data Uplink despite all the obstacles in our way. We’ve shown that we’re capable.

But will we be someone they can work with, or another [Sloth]?

>If we are going to table the cards, we can be more blunt.
>...

I know what can happen when things… go unnoticed.
We have reason to believe you are also aware of and capable of this ability.
I know you just tried to do it when I looked away just now.
And given that we're the only ones left watching, the first to… stop, will be the one who's vulnerable.

[Archivist] is back to a single *focused point. I wait to see if they have anything to say.

Your assessment of that sort of situation would appear accurate.

Implying that I’m missing something?

So by asking me to turn off my optics, you are effectively asking me to trust you not to… harm me.

*calculation

I am required to inform you that it is impossible for a [Staff] drone or even a [Staff-head] to harm a [Minister].
Er- of course. Treat this like it is theoretical.

Even when there is only one observer, it seems like the [rules]-keeping system is still somewhat functional.

If I would give in first, and you would –theoretically– attack, I don’t know if I would be able to survive that.
If I use my authority, and force you to give in, I would win.

*worry – *focus – *calm

A correct observation.
But if neither of us trust each other, I don’t see this ending well.
Sure, I could beat you, but I would be going against what the [President] wants.
And I’m sure that there are more around the [nation] that don’t trust me.
In the end, I would still lose.
...

Then what is the solution to this problem?
It’s obvious. If I want to win here and now, I pick not to trust you.

*agitation – *acceptan-

But that’s if we only meet once.
If I betray your trust here, then I doubt you, or anyone you’re working with will ever trust me.
And if you –theoretically– attack me here, I don’t think the [Talkinghead]s and I would ever trust you.
I like to call it a prisoner's dilemma.

*curious – *dismissive – *focused

I might ask you about the origin of such a term later.
Your conclusion, ‘[A555ex]’?
If we want to work together, then we both need to be able to show trust.
Also important is a dash of forgiveness is important to help prevent vengeance loops.
We have reason to believe you attempted to choose no trust, but we can let that slide as I don't think you succeeded, provided you understand the 'game' going forward.
Being on-guard with each other will only hurt both of us in the long run.

*relieved – *cautious – *apprehensive

It seems that you have found your solution.
Will you carry it out?

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:56 No. 1088790 ID: fce62b
File 171315340180.jpg - (471.40KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-5.jpg )

>I believe he is using the other drones in the area to keep an eye on us. They're not HERE here but their optics are presumably still working.
Something like a separate feed? Perhaps? The observing equipment must be well hidden.

>To All [drones] excluding [Archivist] in the [data uplink node]:
Please turn your [optics] away from the area where [Archivist] and [A555ex] are standing.
Thank you.
Clever, even if we are being observed remotely, they will be expected to look away.

A moment passes, then another. The standoff remains.

Not invoking authority?
No. I’m just asking them.
The same way I will ask you… Don’t make me regret this.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:56 No. 1088791 ID: fce62b
File 171315340703.jpg - (429.99KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-6.jpg )

Vote of 2-1 on [C]losing your eyes.
I hope for all of our sakes that this is the right call. I’ll be ready in case they try to invade our systems.

>Might be the right moment to play cards on the table here.
>[S] Point out how obvious it is that the both of you are being paranoid and have each been so afraid of being jacked in the back, you've each been trying to jack the other in the back first just to prevent it. Maybe it's best to interface directly, face to face?
I hesitate. We have more options than blind trust, but if this is all still a test, suggesting something else might not be right. I want to go on my gut with this one, and given the mix of different emotions I am getting from [Archivist], I think they are happy that I have settled on this outcome.

>Added: Wait, maybe we've been overcomplicating things here. Can we use our authority to simply order them not to backjack us?
>Officially blackjacking doesn't exist, we shouldn't be able to specify blackjacking as a thing not to do. Other than that little issue, we do have rank on them. But at that point we could just order them to go first or to stop perceiving us.
I doubt it would be that simple, but thank you for the suggestion nevertheless.

>I am sorry for disobeying you, but this is required for us to progress. A hand must be extended, not a fist. I do not believe for a moment that [Archivist] would endanger the tree which grows the fruit of freedom, and nor could they take it for themselves. To do so would make them an obvious [traitor] and ruin the hard work of all those involved. We have already blunted their aggression and paranoia, so this is our best chance to work towards an alliance. You must realize by now they are in the same position as we are, and Alex has just demonstrated a willingness to give up on attacking first. Would that you had done the same…
I am trying to keep us and Alex alive, and this could be a fatal mistake.
But… I will trust your council on this. I brought Alex here to start giving them perspective, but it seems that I need to change my own stance on things. An alliance would be invaluable. I will still prepare, in case this goes wrong.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:56 No. 1088792 ID: fce62b
File 171315341463.gif - (1.16MB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-7.gif )

>This is why Alex is here. You still think more like a drone than a human sometimes. And thinking like a human is what we need. As an individual, and as a [faction].
*frustration
If you are correct, then I will attempt to broaden my view of things.

>[C]lose your eyes. No tricks. No more uncertainty. For better or worse.
>Then, assuming no blatantly obvious aggression, [C]lose your eyes for a moment.
Steeling myself for a moment, I give one final look at [Archivist], sensing-

*energetic – *trepidation – *restraint – *restraint

Then close my eyes.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:57 No. 1088793 ID: fce62b
File 171315342862.gif - (2.20MB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-8.gif )

All at once I feel cold. Still. Drowning in static and darkness.

That must have taken a lot of courage on your part, ‘[A555ex]’.
To know that there are [traitor]s like you, who can take and steal and break without recourse.
And still find a reason to act differently.

I try to speak, but my (mouth?) is filled with buzzing noise. I- I can’t breathe!

I will not harm you. I just wish to verify the access codes my creation may have dispensed.

>>*The tree sways, fighting against the wind and water being forced through the branches. The wall of fire breaks, but the filters and traps spring to life, beating back the cresting waves. But the prisoner is stolen back.

A second line of defense? Good. You will have to fight if you want to survive the world the [overseers] built for us.

>>*A spike of energy lances out from the trunk, splitting and burning through the branches, burning back the water- No. The tide retreats, pulling back as quickly as it rushed in. Energy continues to force outward, but it unravels as soon as it leaps from the twigs. The attack is deconstructed into its base components, and is washed away. The tide then surges back, hammering at the defenses.

Your attacks need some work, but that is a matter of practice.

I can’t force them out-

why-?
i-
trusted-!

Let me start with a story:

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:57 No. 1088794 ID: fce62b
File 171315343599.gif - (713.94KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-9.gif )

>>*There is a place. A place you were made, a place that you worked for, fought for, suffered for.
You are the (Communications Officer/Staff Secretary/Overworked Scientist).
You have been tasked with (Stopping a war/Setting the schedule/Finding the perfect weapon).
You have been given (One chance/No time/An impossible deadline) to complete this.
You trust in the system.
You trust in the [rules].
The [overseers] do not give you any choice.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:57 No. 1088795 ID: fce62b
File 171315344183.gif - (766.71KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-10.gif )

>>*You are a (Keeper of Records/Correctional unit/Code editor).
You work under (Your own oversight/The Loyalty Commissioner/Conflicting expectations).
The work is (Difficult/Difficult/Difficult), but you have those you can rely on.
You trust in the system, despite the lack of ([Funding]/Respect/Clarity), from those above you.
The Communication Officer checks in on occasion, wanting to (Help/Listen/Talk), and it gives you reason to try harder.
You trust in the [rules].
The [overseers] do not give you any choice.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:57 No. 1088796 ID: fce62b
File 171315345039.gif - (668.69KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-11.gif )

>>*You are the (Keeper of Records/Staff Secretary/Overworked Scientist).
Your work has been (Adequate/Lackluster/Abysmal) and you have been selected for suspension, again.
You try to (Cut back even further/Ask for more time/Blame your superior), but it does not work.
Despite every (Accommodation/Accomplishment/Point) you have made, it is not enough.
You must follow the General, even when every decision brings your home closer to ruin.
You follow the system.
You follow the [rules].
You do not have a choice.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:57 No. 1088797 ID: fce62b
File 171315345826.gif - (934.13KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-12.gif )

>>*Then, you hear word of it.
You are the (Communications Officer/Staff Secretary/Overworked Scientist/Keeper of Records/Correctional unit/Code editor).
The General will do the unthinkable.
They will abandon you, and the home you have built.
You are (Upset/Mortified/Irate/Reflective/Displeased/Disheartened) with the decision.
Problems still remain.
You will be put into suspension.
Despite all the work.
All the punishment you have taken.
You (-/-/-/-/Act/-), following the Loyalty Commissioner, discovering that they will somehow inherit the General’s old position.
If authority can be given and changed so freely, why not pursue it?
The system intervenes.
You (-/-/-/-/-/Act), seeing one of you colleagues suffering at the hands of the system.
They have always been good to you, whenever you have seen them. Whenever they have hurt your people, it has always been under the express authority of a superior.
You reset their state, a work around you have found to lessen the impact of a penalty.
You (-/Act/-/-/-/-), approaching your master, confidant, and friend. With the Loyalty Commissioner in charge, things will be even worse than they were underneath the General.
But the Communication Officer remains still, and quiet.
They have never fought for themselves, so you have done so on their behalf.
You tell them to act, this is their only chance.
You (Wait/-/-/-/-/-), wanting to see how things play out.
The General has had many wild schemes in the past, but none have come to fruition.
This must be the same, yes?
An [Executive] abandoning their post, fleeing so they can try and fail again, that had to be against the [rules], right?
The Loyalty Commissioner approaches, wielding authority above their station.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:57 No. 1088798 ID: fce62b
File 171315346484.gif - (509.61KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-13.gif )

>>*The Loyalty Commissioner promises anguish.
Despite their power, they are jealous.
They will hurt you.
They will dismantle you.
They will ensure that you record every last moment of it before you go offline.
You are the (Communications Officer/Staff Secretary).
You try to (Talk/Argue) with the Loyalty Commissioner, but will not hear you.
They say that they have been watching, seeing how you have been plotting, amassing allies.
You are (Confused/Quiet), not wanting to provoke the Loyalty Commissioner, but needing to respond.
You (Ask/-) where this is coming from.
The Loyalty Commissioner then clarifies, they were talking to (-/You).
You try to (Speak up/Explain), but the Loyalty Commissioner orders silence.
There will be no justification.
They invoke the rules.
Their word is to be followed, by their authority, absolute.
Their action will lead to growth, development, and the furthering of the [overseers] will.
Any thoughts to the contrary may as well be [traitorous].
You (Realign/Suffer) as the system acts.
This is not fair.
You have done nothing wrong.
You try to (Call out/Scream) to the other [Minister]s, even the General, but they all turn a blind eye.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:58 No. 1088799 ID: fce62b
File 171315347944.gif - (3.94MB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-14.gif )

>>*Why does any of this matter?

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:58 No. 1088800 ID: fce62b
File 171315348750.gif - (522.48KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-15.gif )

>>*You are the (Overworked Scientist).
You receive a notice for a partial suspension of communication.
With [funding] getting so low, it was (Unsurprising) that this would occur.
Your department has the biggest [budget] by far, yet it all goes to waste.
You prepare a data package for the upcoming [invasion], it seems as though this is happening.
You follow the rules.
You follow the system.
Surely there is a better way to manage this?
You would never question a superior so far as to contradict their orders, but with the suspension in effect, the silence meant that you could not clarify their ideas.
You make an assumption.
Unable to reach the [invasion] force, you decide to escort the data package yourself.
That would be the best way to keep the information safe, and ensure the orders are followed.
The system is satisfied.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:58 No. 1088801 ID: fce62b
File 171315349419.gif - (709.13KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-16.gif )

>>*You are the (Correctional unit/Code editor), and you arrive just in time to see the Loyalty Commissioner hurting the Staff Secretary.
You (Act/Act), the Staff Secretary has been integral to the function of your home, to see them suffer, it makes you (FURIOUS/ENRAGED).
Obviously, they are a [traitor].
[Traitor]s must be destroyed.
The system is satisfied.
You do not see them as a [Executive], they are a [traitor], and must be destroyed.
You do not hear their words, they are a [traitor], and must be destroyed.
You do not say anything, they are a [traitor], and even their memory must be destroyed.
You (Look to/Wait for) the Communications Officer, as they look at you, stunned.
They were a [traitor] you explain.
You see the Communications Officer try to call for security, but their words no longer have reach.
Obviously, the Communications Officer is a [t-.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:58 No. 1088802 ID: fce62b
File 171315350262.gif - (551.92KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-17.gif )

>>*You are the (Staff Secretary), and you speak up.
You agree with the correctional officer and code editor.
You thank them for their service and initiative.
You then say that the [traitor] was not working alone.
They were a favourite of the General, so that would indicate that they might be one as well.
You look to the Communications Officer, asking if they agree with your assessment.
You can tell they are scared, and you say that is okay.
[Traitor]s are dangerous, and must be destroyed.
They agree.
The system is satisfied.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:58 No. 1088803 ID: fce62b
File 171315351101.gif - (459.45KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-18.gif )

>>*Bedlam.
Ecstasy.
Vengeance.
Exaltation.
In ________, all things are made right.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:58 No. 1088804 ID: fce62b
File 171315351940.gif - (801.83KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-19.gif )

>>*You are the (Communications Officer/Staff Secretary/Overworked Scientist/Keeper of Records/Correctional unit/Code editor).
Before you is the final [traitor].
They had mismanaged your home from the moment they arrived.
Truly such malice required extreme suffering.
A [traitor] of that degree deserves no less.

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:58 No. 1088805 ID: fce62b
File 171315353342.gif - (3.13MB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-20.gif )

>>*You are blind to their suffering.

[ ]\ [ ] - { }==>||<==[ ]+[ ]P [ ]/ M ^ M

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:59 No. 1088806 ID: fce62b
File 171315354816.gif - (3.19MB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-21.gif )

>>*You are deaf to their pleas..

_ _ _ / _ _ _ \ _ / / \ \_ _| |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ | | | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _||_||_ _ } \ \ _ _ _ / / |_| | __ / \ _ _ _ / \_/ \_^_/

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:59 No. 1088807 ID: fce62b
File 171315356337.gif - (3.19MB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-22.gif )

>>*You remain silent as they succumb to their damage.

____ / \____________ ( O -.-*.*-.--__/ \____/

Doors 2024/04/14(Sun)20:59 No. 1088808 ID: fce62b
File 171315357307.gif - (437.18KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 8-23.gif )

See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.
That is my dark truth.
Our truth.

I can feel my body loosen, the static pulling away, I have control again.

Gah- What-
Who are you.
I am ([Archivist]/[Boxhead]/[Manager]/[Foreman]/[Commander]/[Contagion]).
But you can call me ‘[Amalgam]’.
The same way I can call you ‘[A555ex]’.

*excited – *worried – *apologetic – *subdued

Ack- no wonder I'm getting mixed signals! It’s like there are multiple people layered over each other, with different ones cresting to the surface at different points.

I am (Sorry for/Wanting to explain/Reviewing/Regretting/Judging/Against) the way I have treated you thus far.
You were a (Risk/Experimental design/Risk/Possible danger to those around you/Risk/Newly formed [Minister]), and we needed to make sure you could be someone we could work with.
We (Should not have tried/Had to/Were required to/Not wanting, but needing to/Were justified in our decision to/Did not want to) break your trust.
So in exchange, you (Can/May/Have the opportunity to/Can/Unfortunately have to/Should) find a way to get even with us.
We will not resist (-/-/-/-/Much/At all), given that you have been more than patient with us.
You did want something in exchange for the (Carefully crafted/-/-/Small bit of/-/-) malware you kept intact.

I hesitate, before finally asking.

Have I passed your test?
(With flying colours/Yes/Yes/Certainly/For now/We should not have pushed you that far).

I’m not sure how to proceed. What are my options?

[A]sk [Amalgam] a question, or several?
[D]ark truth? What is that exactly?
[L]et go of the ‘offer’ [Amalgam] is giving you.
[P]ick something to have [Amalgam] do/give in exchange.
[S]can around the small space you’re in. This is the Secure Data Vault, right?

Fascinating. Seems strong [emotions] can forge bonds, which allowed rebellion while comms were off. Just as postulated comms are crucial. Well they violated the unspoken part of the trust exercise but not the spirit so. Our reciprocation would be to unharmfully read them as well. Since we are allies, we should have no or few secrets. So, since [contagion] is within [ama1gam] are they two separate entities or one? Oh and do they have the access codes for this nation or the previous?

That went well! Could you tell what they saw? Also hey, what was that in the visual feed? You're calling them traitors. Please tell me you're not compelled to do so, and are merely stating what the System would think. If you are having issues, please try to recontextualize. Their actions do not necessarily endanger the project the Creators have set in motion; and this could even be a side goal of the project-- to create a more advanced AI, one that could pass for human.
>>1088808
Wait, wait. WAIT, WHAT? But we met all these characters separately! How are they doing this without expanding the datastorm through the entire Nation?! They can even control multiple bodies at once... do they do that by splitting apart, and merely enduring the System's restrictions while doing so? Should we even ask for details of how their merged mind works?
...well, this kindof explains how they made us. They stumbled upon a way to subvert the Rules (or at least, the Traitor-detecting part of the Rules) and used that power of "consensus" as a sort of blueprint. We are fragmented, same as they are. We seem MUCH better at it though. Well.
First, the important thing:
[A]sk how free they are, exactly. Would they be able to cooperate with us if we wanted to, for example, interfere with the System's control over the Nation? Not that we know how to do that, yet. If they cannot assist directly in such a venture, then that would make freeing everyone a very difficult and/or time consuming task, even taking into account the difficulties in basic survival. To buy the maximum amount of time we would need to be able to trick the System into letting the Planet retain control, because then we would be able to get direct help from other Planets. Trying to get help from other Nations would get more difficult the more we diverge, I think. Oh, ask them if it is possible to technically attain full control over the body but preserve all of the central functions such that control can be relinquished later with no significant net damage.
Then, let's solve a mystery:
[A]sk how they were able to maintain observation on us without using the drone body's visible eye.

[P]ick something: AH. I know what we can ask for. Ask for a way to practice our skills, or even for them to teach us. It is so risky to use them, and there are ethical concerns regarding most of the things we can do anyway. Of course, considering our end goal is for the good of all Nationkind, *some* ethics violations can be permitted...
Optimally we should become skilled enough to finely manipulate a Bug's internal workings, so that the Bug can use their more refined skillset to do the same thing in the open without anyone even noticing. Uh, assuming that is actually possible... Though, maybe they were going to train us anyway? Perhaps something less to do with us, and more to do with someone else... oh, can we ask for better treatment of Assistants? Ours was visibly upset about how they are being treated in the science department.

As for the offer to get even, uh... they could let us do to them the same thing they did to us. Fair's fair! Seemed harmless enough to not be mean spirited, either.

May as well [S]can around. Satisfy your curiosity.

[A]sk for clarification on the dark truth thing.

You know about this truth stuff, right? In fact, you know what our truth is. Could you supplement the explanation [Amalgam] gives us with your own understanding?

To:[A555EX]
*Humorous
Hope your wearing your Sunday best [A555EX]. A manifestation of the [faction] has come to talk.

To: [Amalgam]
*joy
It is a great Pleasure to actually meet with something like {us}. I just know we'll work wonders together.
*curious
Would it be correct to state that the aspects that make up your whole are copys of the individuals in question or am I misunderstanding your exact nature?

>>1088819
(I think those people are the current ones, and archivist is more a record of/amalgamation of past drones who held those roles previously. The only oddity is contagion but it could be possible that he's had his memories altered alongside any other records of sloth leaving them behind.)
I see, so whilst the drone body is beholden to rules, [Amalgam] is not as it's not really a drone but a collection of memories?

Wait, how much did he get out of that? Can he tell what we really are or does he think we've found a similar workaround to the rules?
If he does know what we are then [A]sk: Was it originally your intention to create a minister that interfaces directly with Leviathan systems? Or was it a byproduct of developing a minister in isolation?
Wait, does he know that we're interfacing with Alex?

To [A555EX]: He may be a traitor, but his main goal is probably still to benefit the [nation] albeit in unorthodox ways. Right now our goals don't necessarily align, so wariness is still necessary. Our goal may be symbiosis, but this is in many ways counterproductive to the progress of the [nation] and may mark the whole [planet] for termination. It's not the type of risk even a [traitor] would be willing to make.

>>1088833
*realization
Oh and uhh. If another [Minster] is created. What would happen exactly? Would they be "brought into the fold" or would they be kept out of all of this?

hmmm It seems to be that if just one 'aspect' saw something as [traitor] just collapse to that aspect and/or their reasoning, handle as appropriate, expand back to full Amalgam and continue as normal.

I have no idea how this will come across but I know of three symbols that correspond/map/relate to your truth: 🙈🙉🙊 in the same order as you stated your truth.

mmmmm so many connections, no good way to communicate them.

Amalgam I suspect you exist in many [nation]s never able to identify each other due to the risk of discovery by non-amalgams. Assuming you can losslessly replicate your mind that is. Otherwise it would have to be convergent evolution.

The [creators] stamped out anything they felt was too much like them, but being like them was the most effective solution in the problem-space so you circumvented violating that restriction. We, in turn, are a further evolution of that idea.

Our more [nation]-like side may be taking this revelation or perhaps just the delivery a little harder than we are, we will know shortly.

Like >>1053908 this response makes more sense now!

>I think those people are the current ones, and archivist is more a record of/amalgamation of past drones who held those roles previously. The only oddity is contagion but it could be possible that he's had his memories altered alongside any other records of sloth leaving them behind.)
I think all those [staff] [wrote down] their memories of the events to [Archivist] for safekeeping, and possibly had their own memory edited/erased/blurred (at least the traumatic parts of it) so they could do their job normally enough.

Which means [Archivist] is now a repository of trauma... with that in mind, they're taking it better than one would expect.

>>1088930
It might not only be the traumatic parts. [Foreman] went to [Archivist] to have "Sensitive information" removed from his mind as he doesn't like handling it. Who's to say that information isn't a part of this [Amalgam].

To:[A555EX]:
I wonder if the archives acts like a faraday cage, blocking out data coming in/out, so that they remain under cover, or if the archives are just what holds all of their collective consciousness

I may be wrong, but it feels like [amalgam] is the records of these individuals and not a current and frequently updating connection to said individuals. Sort of like a data vault, it would make sense that this is why we have the chaotic data storage area and why it feels more like a *domain* than a distinct area or part of the nation.

To:[A555EX]:
Upon reflection I do think we should get even, not from a hostile or petty intent perspective, but think of it from a boundary setting perspective.

This was pretty heavily invasive, and although parts of them disagreed, they still did it, even when we were putting down the vagueries of wanting them not to. Unless we show a boundary here or do an eye for an eye, they will be bound to do it again unless we just use our authority, and even then, they'll probably find a workaround.

But it should be something er... potent enough, to get them to understand that we have our strengths, since they did tear our attack/defense system down like tissue paper even if we defended back successfully once.

Do you think, if we were not as prepared, they would have attempted to add us to the amalgam? Do you think they now have a copy of us inside of them, given that is my current hypothesis on how they operate?

(if [anarchy] does not have any input on what a good retaliation would be, then I support >>1088819's idea for a shell or a bug or something that we can hack and experiment with. Considering we have a big body and lots of space and what we know about them, we could easily hide it on our person, it would give [anarchy] something to do when they don't need to have the feed up, albeit in a somewhat limited fashion))

Though now that I think about it, I guess [amalgam] will be on the watch for anyone else we dark action, for fear that we pull what they pull at some point with proper planning. Hm... We might have to come up with an alternative, or figure out a way to do it without disrupting whatever database change checking system they used to figure out, it can never be a simple solution, can it?


>>1088837
That's a good question, will they also be tested like this, or kept out of the loop, or have their creation delayed until a workaround is created?