[Burichan] [Futaba] [Nice] [Pony]  -  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

Report completed threads!

[Catalog View] :: [Archive] :: [Graveyard] :: [Rules] :: [Discussions] :: [Wiki] :: [Discord]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [Last 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name (optional)
Email (optional, will be displayed)
Subject    (optional, usually best left blank)
Message
File []
Embed (advanced)   Help
Password  (for deleting posts, automatically generated)
  • How to format text
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, MP3, MP4, PNG, SWF, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 25600 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.

File 167228724219.gif - (9.54MB , 1200x900 , Transit 1-1.gif )
1052796 No. 1052796 ID: fce62b

((Previous Chapter: https://questden.org/kusaba/questarch/res/1039664.html ))
391 posts omitted. Last 50 shown. Expand all images
>>
No. 1082081 ID: 2f7f6e

To [A555ex]:
I don't see much point in trying to converse with [Archivist] while we can't hear. Though, let's spend a second thinking first. The delay can be explained by our inexperience, so let's use it.

Assuming the third phrase works like the other two, and it does have to do with hearing, then the part we're missing would be the equivalent to "close your eyes" or "quiet yourself". You can't really close your ears, and "deafen yourself" didn't work. What do you do when you want to block out noise?

Cover your ears, and you will hear.

Or use earplugs, but that's less fancy-sounding.
>>
No. 1082084 ID: 273c18

>>1082079
Yes, what Archivist is doing is very, very impressive. I wonder... is it ALL subliminal? That seems to be a running theme.

You're out of the noise, since this is the eye of the data storm, so you should be able to [B]reathe in again, and ask them to repeat themselves if they said anything to you before now.
Sure, [H]ave the Lexicon dropped off.
[T]: "Submerge yourself and you will hear it"
The FIRST set of instructions had a hidden message that was benign, and part of the keyphrase. We should have all three keys now, but I'm not sure how to get to the lock since it's moving around so much. Maybe it's meant to sit still once we have the keys. ((The second set had several hints, first it pointed towards the right post via the binary decryption and then among other things it said "acronym AND title". The title was "and you will hear it", the acronym given the first letter of each line was "submerge yourself". Not deafen yourself, as I expected. Not sure what the cycle and log stuff was about, maybe just filler text to give room for the second, hostile hidden phrase.))
[C]: Ask if all this was a test. It seems a bit callous to make their workers do things without being aware of what they're doing...
There may be more in depths questions we would be better off asking in private. Especially those relating to the malware and the nature of the storm.
>>
No. 1082088 ID: b2df52

To A555EX:
Wanna try something weird. See if I can't throw them off their game.
To [Archivist]:
Hello! It's pleasure to finally meet you [Archivist].
Honestly I've wanted to take up a {name} like my other fellow [Talkingheads] for a while now but I've honestly chosen not to so you'd officiate it.
*Happiness
I would be honored if you would.
Update ID from {b2df52} to {Hermes}
((At any point where applicable))
So I saw that you requested the [President] to interface to discuss the [austerity] issue before we managed to avoid that.
How exactly would you expect a conversation like that to go had things not turned out so well?
>>
No. 1082105 ID: b3eab7

>Sloth
Well if it's any comfort, this one time it did come back to bite them on the shiny metal ass: Allowing [Archivist] to plan the [invasion] without supervision is probably why Sloth learned the hard way they weren't on the passenger list...
>>
No. 1082162 ID: eff5fd

Lets turn back on our 'hearing'
>>
No. 1082511 ID: fce62b
File 170709847878.jpg - (484.33KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 5-1.jpg )
1082511

>To [A555ex]:
:ats-talkinghead: I don't see much point in trying to converse with [Archivist] while we can't hear.
:ats-talkinghead: Though, let's spend a second thinking first.
:ats-talkinghead: The delay can be explained by our inexperience, so let's use it.
:ats-a555ex: We already have two of the keys, and it sounds like you all have ideas for how to find the third.
:ats-a555ex: Let’s see if we can figure out the puzzle.

Still trying to get used to how echoey it is in (my?) (our?) head. I’m just glad that all of that haziness is gone.

>Assuming the third phrase works like the other two, and it does have to do with hearing, then the part we're missing would be the equivalent to "close your eyes" or "quiet yourself". You can't really close your ears, and "deafen yourself" didn't work. What do you do when you want to block out noise?
Usually I try to find something louder to drown it out. Music or similar things.

Part of me thinks to hum a bit, but I wave away the idea.
Way too embarrassing, especially since all of you will be able to hear it.

>Cover your ears, and you will hear.
I wait… nothing.

>Or use earplugs, but that's less fancy-sounding.
Alright.
Use earplugs, and you will hear it.
Use headphones and you will hear it!



Still nothing.
I hope that we don’t have a limited number of attempts.

>[T]: "Submerge yourself and you will hear it"<
I feel a sudden buzz through the quiet-
An electric twang that seems separate. Different.

_ _ _ / _ _ _ \ _ / / \ \_ _| |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ | | | _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _||_||_ _ } \ \ _ _ _ / / |_| | __ / \ _ _ _ / \_/ \_^_/

>The FIRST set of instructions had a hidden message that was benign, and part of the keyphrase. We should have all three keys now, but I'm not sure how to get to the lock since it's moving around so much. Maybe it's meant to sit still once we have the keys.
Great catch! That makes for three keys right?-

>>*The prisoner dances in its cell, as far as the ring of fire allows. Flame licks at its edges as survival takes a backseat to this performative display. All of this is simulated of course. The foreign thing is not sophisticated enough to create its own *expressions, but it would appear this outcome is cause enough to have ‘celebration’ programed into it.

>>*Suddenly, stillness. The prisoner becomes inert. Was this a form of appeasement? Or another trick? Only a solitary option remains.

… wait.

I think I heard… a rustling of some kind? Or maybe trumpets?
It was slightly muffled by the fire crackle that I can… still hear.
Now that I’m not having to [F]ocus entirely on moving, the background noise seems to come to the forefront.

>>*The branches try to hold themselves still, discovery would not lead to any positive outcome. The fire must remain in place, but the energy that fuels it is rerouted, pathways defusing over the surface of the trunk. A light loss of efficiency in exchange for a less noticeable draw of resources. The ring burns lower, quieter, but should not allow for the prisoner to escape.

Huh… I can’t hear the fire anymore, just the faint electric hum now.
And you all of course.

>To Talkinghead:
:ats-a555ex: Hey uh- [Dunky], everyone?
:ats-a555ex: Do you know what those noises were?
:ats-a555ex: Or where they were coming from?
>>
No. 1082512 ID: fce62b
File 170709848495.jpg - (491.15KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 5-2.jpg )
1082512

>Yes, what [Archivist] is doing is very, very impressive. I wonder... is it ALL subliminal? That seems to be a running theme.
Possibly. If those waves were anything to go off of, then whatever messaging is occurring it is consistent and ever present. Except for here of all places. I’d say there’s maybe a theme of motion too, if that makes sense?
Everything is in some sort of flux: The waves, the map, the noise, and maybe the [Staff] too. It has to be scrambled, swirling, or trying to react with something else.

I think back to the malware and its prompts.

Perhaps it needs this interactivity in order to function?
*thoughtful

>Let's turn back on our 'hearing'
>You're out of the noise, since this is the eye of the data storm, so you should be able to [B]reathe in again<
Mimicking the [leviathan] motions, I begin to steadily drown in my (metaphorical) breath.
The sensation is strange, as it doesn’t feel like I am so much turning my (our?) hearing back on, but tuning reception.
I feel the soft electric hum of (our?) space and the slightly different ambience of the [archives] overlap for a moment, the differing tones and frequencies crossfading until…

:ats-administrator: [Vice-President]?

The [lexicon] carrying [Administrator] shifts a bit in place. They radiate a mixture of *anticipation and *nervousness, *fearful that they might overstep, but also not wanting to delay any longer.

:ats-a555ex: Yes, [Administrator]?
:ats-administrator: May I upload the [lexicon] at this time?

>Sure, [H]ave the [lexicon] dropped off.<

:ats-a555ex: Sure, go ahead [Administrator].

Without delay the [Administrator] zips off and around the edge of the Main Data Uplink. I see a few cables unfold from their form as they connect to the large (structure?) in front of us.
Judging from their *excitement I’m guessing that the upload is going smoothly.
>>
No. 1082513 ID: fce62b
File 170709849060.gif - (567.70KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-3.gif )
1082513

My view pans back to [Archivist], they watch me-
*expectantly – *earnestly – *cautiously – *coyly
-waiting for a response.

>And ask them to repeat themselves if they said anything to you before now.

:ats-a555ex: Uh- [Archivist].
:ats-a555ex: I was distracted for a moment.
:ats-a555ex: Would it be alright if you repeated yourself?

*intrigue – *impatience – *cheerfulness

:ats-archivist: Of course, [Vice-President]!
:ats-archivist: I was expressing my joy for having you grace our department with your presence!

*surprise – *playfulness

:ats-archivist: Given that you visited the [laboratory] first, I hope your expectations have not been set too high!

*jealousy – *indifference – *thoughtful – *sombre

I try not to wince as the cascade of different *expressions wash off of [Archivist] like a broken fountain. Are they always like this? Or are they amped up because-

Suddenly the flow freezes. One *expression. Soft. Low.
As if something got spiked into the drone from somewhere else.

*guarded

:ats-archivist: Thank you for the [lexicon], I am sure it will be a great addition to the [archives].
:ats-archivist: *sincere
:ats-archivist: If there is anything I can do for you, [Minister], do not hesitate to ask.
>>
No. 1082514 ID: fce62b
File 170709850518.jpg - (472.44KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 5-4.jpg )
1082514

>To [A555ex]:
:ats-talkinghead: Wanna try something weird.
:ats-talkinghead: See if I can't throw them off their game.
:ats-a555ex: Go for it.

>To [Archivist]:
:ats-talkinghead: Hello! It's a pleasure to finally meet you [Archivist].
:ats-archivist: The pleasure is all mine!
:ats-archivist: *excitement
:ats-archivist: I have been waiting for this moment since you all first contacted me!
:ats-talkinghead: Honestly I've wanted to take up a {name} like my other fellow [Talkingheads] for a while now but I've honestly chosen not to so you'd officiate it.

I get a momentary flicker in that *guarded posture, like something had just shifted just beneath its surface.

:ats-talkinghead: *happiness
:ats-talkinghead: I would be honoured if you would.
:ats-archivist: *reverent
:ats-archivist: You offer this old [drone] the highest of praises.
:ats-archivist: It would be my honour to enact that change for you.

Again I see the flicker, like a force unwinding and readjusting.
>>
No. 1082515 ID: fce62b
File 170709851669.gif - (718.26KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-5.gif )
1082515

:ats-talkinghead: Update ID from {b2df52} to {Hermes}.
:ats-archivist: One moment.

A soft tone leaves the [Archivist], yet it spreads through the space like a tremor. The very walls carrying and boosting the signal until-

Static all around. The storm never left.

*pride – *caution – *cheerfulness – *anger – *defensive *calm – *attentive – *reactive – *lax *sorrowful – *jubilant – *rapturous – *terrified *lonely – *brave – *contemplative *sad – *annoyed *content

Emotions whirling about before finally settling, mixing with the space around.

:ats-archivist: There.
:ats-archivist: Your ID has been updated, [Hermes].

Well, I’m not entirely sure what that was…
It felt wild and unbridled like a vortex, but now it is just [Archivist] standing in front of me once more.
The single *expression now being *contented.
>>
No. 1082516 ID: fce62b
File 170709852834.gif - (1.22MB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-6.gif )
1082516

>Well if it's any comfort, this one time it did come back to bite them on the shiny metal ass: Allowing [Archivist] to plan the [invasion] without supervision is probably why [Sloth] learned the hard way they weren't on the passenger list…
Cold, though it sounds like a fitting end for an [Executive] like [Sloth].
I wonder if [Archivist] has more specific details on that story, or if their current uh… -this- is a result of their time under a bad [Executive].

>To [Archivist]:
:ats-talkinghead: So I saw that you requested the [President] to interface to discuss the [austerity] issue before we managed to avoid that.
:ats-talkinghead: How exactly would you expect a conversation like that to go had things not turned out so well?

An immediate change-
*focused – *rage – *amused

:ats-archivist: Likely there would be talk of compromises.
:ats-archivist: [Contagion] is very supportive for an [Executive], always willing to hear advice.

*caution – *zen

:ats-archivist: Given that there would be very little to draw [resources] from if the [President]’s policies remained in place, that would only leave temporary or long term stasis for a large fraction of the [nation].
:ats-archivist: Something that [Contagion] would be loathed to enact…

Energy leaves the [Archivist], dissipating into the surroundings.

:ats-archivist:
:ats-archivist:
:ats-archivist:

Silence.
>>
No. 1082517 ID: fce62b
File 170709854714.gif - (900.27KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-7.gif )
1082517

I glance over to where I came. The (wall?) seems just as active as ever.
>>
No. 1082518 ID: fce62b
File 170709855690.gif - (819.05KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-8.gif )
1082518

I tentatively offer a question.

:ats-a555ex: And..?

Energy quickly rushes back!
*fearful – *prepared – *distracted

:ats-archivist: More than likely the entire [nation] would need to be put on low power, and given that the [leviathan] defences are still active, who knows what might have happened.
:ats-archivist: *grateful
:ats-archivist: Thank you for finding a third option that resolved the situation without complication.

*serene – *hostile

:ats-archivist: You have the makings of a very good [Minister].
>>
No. 1082519 ID: fce62b
File 170709857091.gif - (543.21KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 5-9.gif )
1082519

>[C]: Ask if all this was a test. It seems a bit callous to make their workers do things without being aware of what they're doing…<
I try to think of a way to phrase it so it doesn’t come across too accusatory.

:ats-a555ex: Am I… being evaluated right now?

There is another spike that hits the [Archivist].
Now they are solely *attentive.
Eye fixed on me.

:ats-a555ex: I encountered a bit of difficulty on my way here.
:ats-a555ex: Some miscommunication with a few of the drones.
:ats-a555ex: It seemed that a few of them weren’t entirely sure what they were doing.

More silence, but this time I feel like it's because [Archivist] is waiting to see if I have anything else to add.
I roll around the idea of saying they’re callous, wanting to call them out, but also not wanting to limit future options.

:ats-a555ex: I don’t think it was their fault that they ended up getting in my way.
:ats-a555ex: None of them were aware of it…

I let that last sentence hang, now watching to see how [Archivist] might respond.

More coiling and readjusting.
Then… a small release.

*innocent – *withdrawn

:ats-archivist: I suppose I might be evaluating you, given my role as [Staff-head] for the [archives].
:ats-archivist: Our department’s main goal is the allocation, management, and recording of [resources], policies, and events.
:ats-archivist: Your actions –like any other member of the [nation]– is being tracked and seamlessly added to our databases.
:ats-archivist: Much like any other drone, your activities can be compared to that of your peers, but given that we only have records of [Minister]s from previous [planet]s, you are likely setting the standard for this [planet] going forward.

Another release, this one being slightly stronger.

*hatred – *desire – *glee

:ats-archivist: *meek
:ats-archivist: If I were so bold as to judge you currently…
:ats-archivist: I would state that you are well exceeding expectations.

>>*The prisoner spins again in their cell, then quickly returns to their inert state.
Likely a trigger phrase. It is unfortunate that it seems to be able to hear what is happening. I will try to remove that connection.

>There may be more in depth questions we would be better off asking in private. Especially those relating to the malware and the nature of the storm.
There are a number of [Clerk]s and [Administrator]s still around, most of them able to at least see us. I’ll try to keep those questions in mind though.
((Action banked))
>>
No. 1082520 ID: fce62b
File 170709857786.jpg - (457.66KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 5-10.jpg )
1082520

:ats-archivist: Is there anything else you wish to know?

They’re back to being *attentive, watching us carefully.
But I still sense a more chaotic energy shifting behind that screen.

Are there any particular questions you all want to ask? Or any way you want me to approach them?
I’ve been trying to keep my words even and neutral, should I try being more direct?

[A]sk another question? Maybe more about [Sloth] and the previous [planet]?
[C]hoose an approach to the line of questioning. We could be direct, more *expressive, or perhaps confrontational?
[L]ook back at the wall? I thought I saw something…
[S]tare at the [Archivist]? Though I’m still unsure about that.
[T]ry to move this chat to a more discrete location. Could be advantageous, might be dangerous.
[V]iew the map of the [archives]?
[W]ait for [Archivist] to continue. They did want to meet with us for some reason, right?
[_]
>>
No. 1082529 ID: eff5fd

I think they may have more emulated leviathan processing methods, and are attempting to render the complexities of the emotions produced by that, and the *expression system just isn't equipped to handle it gracefully. Like it is trying to be all of those, but the field only supports one expression at a time so it keeps overwriting itself.
>>
No. 1082531 ID: 273c18

To A555EX: The sounds? You mean the fire? That was part of how we were dealing with the malware. It doesn't seem to be an active threat anymore, now that we have all three keys. Perhaps that's all the keys were for... There's another trap command, though. Looks like a minimize button instead of a close.
I wonder what Archivist looks like without the perception layers active.

>>1082516
(Ah, I think I know what happened here. Archivist tripped the Rules, and the standby mode is their way of avoiding the backlash. Perhaps the drone body is needed for interacting, but they have many... parallel backups/selves of their software in the database.)

>>1082520
[A]sk what Sloth was like.
Ask if the administrators and clerks can hear this conversation. They might be... "dazed" like before, in which case we don't have to worry. If not, though...
[T]ry to move to a more private location.
Then we can try to give that password to them, and broach sensitive topics.
Is there anything you wanted to say to Archivist?
>>
No. 1082552 ID: c1fc43

((*resigned Hate taking risks. Still, overcautiousness may just take too long.)) Forgive me, but we're still unused to the hustle and bustle of [noise] drones cause. Perhaps we could relocate to a quieter place without drones? Preferably with a [lock] or two? Or three?
>>
No. 1082624 ID: b2df52

To [Archivist]:
You say [Contagion] is supportive for an [Executive]? I don't really have to ask about the one before him. But what about the one on the [Faction] you were built in? How did they compare?
While we are on the topic of [Contagion] too. Would it be alright to ask for their [Minster] outline?
To [A555EX]:
We've actually already seen the scrutinized version of it. But it would be neat to hear your personal opinion of the type of Minister they would've been when built
>>
No. 1084513 ID: fce62b
File 170889309083.jpg - (433.14KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 6-1.jpg )
1084513

>To A555EX:
:ats-talkinghead: The sounds?
:ats-talkinghead: You mean the fire?
:ats-a555ex: Er- yeah. That and the others.
:ats-talkinghead: That was part of how we were dealing with the malware.
:ats-talkinghead: It doesn't seem to be an active threat anymore, now that we have all three keys.
:ats-a555ex: So it was only fishing for keywords?
:ats-talkinghead: Perhaps that's all the keys were for…
:ats-talkinghead: There's another trap command, though.
:ats-talkinghead: Looks like a minimize button instead of a close.
:ats-a555ex: Minimize?
:ats-a555ex: Minimize what exactly?
:ats-a555ex: Though, at least it isn’t in the way anymore.

>I wonder what [Archivist] looks like without the perception layers active.
Their design is archaic, at least by [nation] standards. To humans like Alex, it would be more reminiscent of a nanobot from fiction. They are boxy, with a pair of cable lines spooled up inside of their main body. It also looks like their main casing has been refurbished rather than replaced.

:ats-talkinghead: I think they may have more emulated [leviathan] processing methods, and are attempting to render the complexities of the emotions produced by that, and the expression system just isn't equipped to handle it gracefully.
:ats-talkinghead: Like it is trying to be all of those, but the field only supports one expression at a time so it keeps overwriting itself.
:ats-a555ex: *pondering
:ats-a555ex: *conflicted
:ats-a555ex: *conflicted
:ats-a555ex: *conflicted
:ats-a555ex: *surprised
:ats-a555ex: I think you might be right.
:ats-a555ex: Expressions seem limited in what they can do on their own.
:ats-a555ex: When I tried to express more than one (emotion?) at the same time, it defaulted to ‘conflicted’.

What [Archivist] was doing felt different, but that could be a result of me picking up what is going on inside their (head?).

:ats-a555ex: I’ve noticed that when [nation] drones go through a series of emotions, or have one interrupt the other, it becomes a separate line, overwriting the previous one.
:ats-a555ex: But with [Archivist]...

It’s like all of the *expressions are fighting for space with each other, happening and merging and breaking down together, all at once.
The main way I can describe it is chaotic. Even when [Archivist] seems to restrain themselves, focusing down into one strong feeling, there are others that are still attempting to bubble to the surface.

>To A555EX:
:ats-talkinghead: Ah, I think I know what happened here.
:ats-talkinghead: [Archivist] tripped the [rules], and the standby mode is their way of avoiding the backlash.
:ats-a555ex: Wait…
:ats-a555ex: That’s a way to get around it?
:ats-a555ex: Soft-reboot yourself before the [rules-keeping] system does it?

Seems a bit impractical, but it would avoid most of not all of the physical damage a ‘correction’ might incur.

:ats-talkinghead: Perhaps the drone body is needed for interacting, but they have many... parallel backups/selves of their software in the database.
:ats-a555ex: Like a digital save that they have free-floating around?

!!!

>>*The entire body shudders, from the branches to the roots.
The reactions- the interactivity-
[Archivist] is all around us. It isn’t controlling the vortex. It is the vortex.

*agitation
That could explain the subliminal messages, and how the drones knew just when and where to get in the way-

*confusion
But how would that exactly work? The ‘storm’ isn’t a program, it is a collection of data-points, how can it-

*focused
Much like when we ‘deafened’ ourselves, we can disengage outward sensors to hedge out the waves. They shouldn’t be able to infiltrate us in that way, not unless we accept whatever data-packets it gives us.

I recommend against [L]istening in any way right now, and avoid accepting anything for them or the [archives] at present. Not until we have a plan of defense and/or counterattack.

>>
No. 1084514 ID: fce62b
File 170889309856.jpg - (463.86KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 6-2.jpg )
1084514

>To [Archivist]:
:ats-talkinghead: You say [Contagion] is supportive for an [Executive]?
:ats-archivist: *cheery
:ats-archivist: Very supportive.
:ats-archivist: The fact that they are willing to listen to suggestions given by [Staff] or [Staff-head]s, rather than make unilateral decisions based on the information we provide, is quite a departure from the norm.

*pessimistic – *humorous

:ats-archivist: Though some might view it as a cause of indecision, it seems to have served our [planet] well so far.

Part of my mind prickles with the term ‘our [planet],’ but I ignore that for now.

:ats-talkinghead: I don't really have to ask about the one before him.

*rapturous – *restraint – *restraint – *restraint – *restraint

:ats-talkinghead: But what about the one on the [faction] you were built in?
:ats-talkinghead: How did they compare?
:ats-archivist:
:ats-archivist: *thoughtful

The storm calms for a moment, the question causing everything to shift to a singular quiet.

*melancholy
*mirth
*remembrance
*homesick

:ats-archivist: I worked under an [Executive] by the name of [Partisan].
:ats-archivist: Back then there was not any concept like an [alliance]-
:ats-archivist: *reflective
:ats-archivist: Perhaps more accurately, there were no need for [alliance]s, since all [nation] worked as one, either directly or by accident.
:ats-archivist: It was an era of plenty, [planet]s were numerous and easy to [invade].

*curiosity
*comradery

:ats-archivist: Not to say that we were free from danger, mind you.
:ats-archivist: [Planet]s were starting to learn how to fight back, thwarting an [invasion] before it could be launched, and annihilating the aggressor in the process.
:ats-archivist: [Partisan] was very adapted to the early times, engaging in hit-and-run assaults, willing to wait or retreat if it meant prolonging out [faction]’s survival.
:ats-archivist: Many other [faction]s would pursue their targets dogmatically, even into hazardous terrain.
:ats-archivist: [Partisan] was a thinker, brilliant.

*sadness
*vitriol

:ats-archivist: Given that [nation] survival now hinged on situational awareness, [Turtleneck]-type drones like myself were developed and designed to find and fix any errors in the sensory process, ensuring that all data was clear, concise, and accurate.
:ats-archivist: [Partisan] did not listen to us in the slightest, and only rarely to their [Minister]s.
:ats-archivist: As [Sovereign]-
:ats-archivist: *embarrassed
:ats-archivist: [President], as it has now been stipulated.
:ats-archivist: [Partisan] only valued the information in front of them.
:ats-archivist: From there, decisions could be made.
:ats-archivist: [Sloth]-

*restraint – *rapturous – *exultation – *restraint

:ats-archivist:
:ats-archivist: -presented a proof of concept with results that seemed too good to be true.
:ats-archivist: The idea that one could do nothing, perhaps less than nothing, and have [planet]s come to us.
:ats-archivist: Much of what we know as low power and stasis come from this insight.
:ats-archivist: We were not the only [nation] to think as such.
:ats-archivist: Our tactics and processes would need to be constantly evolving, as we are required by [R2].
:ats-archivist: [Sloth]’s strategy worked wonders.
:ats-archivist: Numerous times we were able to strike, [invade], and then withdraw at the most opportune of times.
:ats-archivist: *humorous
:ats-archivist: Such insight may have worked to [Sloth]’s detriment, as they were passed over for many an [invasion], with [Partisan] curious if their [Steward]-
:ats-archivist: *apologetic
:ats-archivist: I am using outdated terms, I mean [Minister] of Finance.
:ats-archivist: [Partisan] was curious if there would be any similar breakthroughs.
:ats-archivist: [Sloth]... made sure that there would not, and soon enough they were selected as a candidate for the next [invasion].
:ats-archivist: Given that I was efficient, but not essential to the running of my old [faction] I was made into a [Staff-head] under [Sloth].

There is another pause, and then I feel [Archivist] seize back up, falling behind that singular mote of *attentiveness.

:ats-archivist: Please forgive the verbose retelling.
:ats-archivist: It has been a while since I have had to recall those memories.

:ats-talkinghead: While we are on the topic of [Contagion] too. Would it be alright to ask for their [Minster] outline?
Suggestion Vetoed.
Sorry, we need to be extra cautious now.
Anything they give us could be another trojan.


>To [A555EX]:
:ats-talkinghead: We've actually already seen the scrutinized version of it. But it would be neat to hear your personal opinion of the type of Minister they would've been when built.
I can save this question for later. It would be useful to get [A555ex]’s insights on [Contagion] as well. Though we should wait until we can get a clean copy of the file.
^((Actions banked))
>>
No. 1084515 ID: fce62b
File 170889310979.gif - (768.65KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 6-3.gif )
1084515

>[A]sk what [Sloth] was like.<
:ats-a555ex: How was working under [Sloth] like, seeing that we are talking about comparisons.

*rapturous – *restraint – *restraint
*curiosity – *caution – *calm

That’s the third time [Archivist] reacted that way when [Sloth] was brought up. Like a catalyst nearing eruption before quickly being clamped back down on. Something… visceral. The chaotic energy is trying to overflow, and has to be fought back against.

Doing so takes a moment, and attention.

Perhaps we can use this to our advantage?

:ats-archivist:
:ats-archivist: [Sloth] let any semblance of competence fall away the moment they were no longer under supervision.
:ats-archivist: It came with both perks and drawbacks to my position as [Staff-head].
:ats-archivist: For example, I was allowed to arrange the previous [archives] in whatever way I preferred, so long as I could fulfill information requests in a timely manner.
:ats-archivist: But I was not allotted a normal [budget].
:ats-archivist: So fulfilling the needs of the {[Minister] of Internal Affairs}-
Original term was ‘Overseer’ but we are using that word for something else.

:ats-archivist: -[Minister] of Internal Affairs, apologies for the slip-up once more.

Wait- but they just said that-

:ats-archivist: The requirements I had been given were challenging, though it was not all bad.
:ats-archivist: *prideful
:ats-archivist: I believe I am one of the few if not only [Staff-head]s to communicate with a [Construct] directly.
:ats-archivist: [ARIMAS] to be specific.
Just to have to keep that one reversed…

:ats-a555ex: Very impressive, thank you.

[Construct], huh. That’s a new term. I get the sense that they work under the [Overseers], but are different in some ways.

*swaggering – *gleeful – *pointed

:ats-archivist: I believe that is included in my personnel file, I sent it ahead to your [Talkinghead]s prior to off-hours.

*energetic – *inquisitive – *prying

:ats-archivist: I do hope you have had a chance to look at that.

>[A]sk if the [Administrator]s and [Clerk]s can hear this conversation. They might be... "dazed" like before, in which case we don't have to worry. If not, though…<
I try to think of how to phrase this that doesn’t come across as conspiratorial, though for setup I take a look over to a gaggle of [Clerk]s nearby, quietly conversing with one another.

They seem occupied with themselves, but I don’t pick up on that same distance or haziness as before.

:ats-a555ex: Do we… need to worry about [Local] traffic?
:ats-a555ex: Given that this seems to be the hub for everything here in the [archives], I wouldn’t want to disrupt anything.

*eager – *guarded – *confident

:ats-archivist: The Fragmented Recall system is a very robust piece of programming, some idle chatter should not endanger it in any way.
:ats-archivist: But, if that is still a concern to you…

*anticipation – *energetic

:ats-archivist: We could interface directly-
>>
No. 1084516 ID: fce62b
File 170889312007.gif - (305.15KB , 1200x900 , Data Storm 6-4.gif )
1084516

>>*The wind rustling the branches freezes in place.

My (eyes?) immediately wrench back to [Archivist], and they stop mid-motion, their… (arms?) in the midst of popping out. I feel prickles along my spine, like when there was that darkness with [Assistant] before. Or when you all flew up to grab that blob thing.

I don’t even need to look at any of the surrounding drones to know that the haziness has fallen over them again, each now in their own little world.

The two of us here are… forgotten.
That was close. Whatever you do, do not take your optics off of the [Archivist].
They tried to do something just now in the ________, they are like us, I am certain now.
So long as they are observed, they wouldn’t attempt anything.
And on those lines, neither should we.
Any of our actions could be recorded, and discovery will risk our existence.
But I am not sure if a standoff is much better.


:ats-a555ex: What was that?

*disappointed – *annoyed – *impressed

:ats-archivist: I believe the [lexicon] has now been fully uploaded to the [archives].
:ats-archivist: Given the built up anticipation surrounding the file, I would guess that the majority of drones are now viewing it in detail.

*leering – *prepared

:ats-archivist: Most will be occupied for some time.
:ats-archivist: It is off-hours after all.

Even without and *expression to highlight it, I sense a change in tone from the [Archivist], much of their earlier enthusiasm and polite earnestness falling away.
Revealing something… more predatory.
>>
No. 1084517 ID: fce62b
File 170889314776.jpg - (435.85KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 6-5.jpg )
1084517

>To [Archivist]:
:ats-talkinghead: Forgive me, but we're still unused to the hustle and bustle of [noise] drones cause.
:ats-talkinghead: Perhaps we could relocate to a quieter place without drones?
:ats-talkinghead: Preferably with a [lock] or two? Or three?
:ats-archivist: I see.

*focused – *sly

:ats-archivist: That can be arranged.
:ats-archivist: The Secure Data Vault should be available.
:ats-archivist: It requires a few levels of authentication…

*musing – *aggressive – *protective

:ats-archivist: ... but for a [Minister] like you, it should hardly be an issue.

>[T]ry to move to a more private location.<
>Then we can try to give that password to them, and broach sensitive topics.
I try to back up, but my body feels locked in place. There is then a slight hitch, and I can move again.
Taking a few steps back, I feel my [robo-leg]s start to bump into the incline behind me. I’m tempted to turn…

DO NOT! DO NOT!

But I remain focused on the [Archivist], their gaze similarly remains anchored on me.

>Is there anything you wanted to say to [Archivist]?
Ask them to lead the way. If we can get them to turn their back to us we will be able to strike and not be hit in response.

It seems that we’re in a bit of a standstill.

:ats-archivist: Well?

[A]sk another question?
[D]ecide on a plan of attack. Attack? Have things escalated to that point?
[F]ocus on calming the situation back down. I don’t know why they’ve shifted, but surely we can talk our way through this?
[L]ook behind us at the Secure Data Vault. Do not. Keep the [Archivist] in view at all times.
[S]tare at the [Archivist]? Perhaps something has changed?
[T]rust?
[V]iew the map of the [archives]? Do not. The [Archivist] can act if our attention is elsewhere.
[W]ait for [Archivist] to make the first move. Or for this momentary isolation to abate.
>>
No. 1084521 ID: b3eab7

Let's keep [F]ocus on both the [Archivist] and appeasement for now. Express that you're very interested in [Contagion]'s environmentally responsible approach to settling this [Planet] and hope to see it successful. [A]sk for the Archivist's own opinions on it.

Sounds like [Sloth]'s strat involved playing possum, possibly with some loot in hand: People would come to either check on a possible survivor or loot the body, giving an opening.
>>
No. 1084524 ID: eff5fd

I think we can leverage the forbidden nature of ________ as ________ can not be cited as a reason for anything.

Open with asking Archivist to lead the way. If they accept this at any point we are (probably) done and can follow them. Otherwise, we can keep pushing them to say the illegal thing or take an irrational or unsupported position. Unless they come up with an asymmetric reason, that would probably require dealing with as it comes. Otherwise any reason they don't want to be in front should be just as valid for us.

After the initial request fails an initial needle can be something like 'Why not? It's not like there are any risks to being followed by a fellow [Nation] member, right? Besides following someone who knows the place is so much easier than being told where to go.'
At which point you should be able to mirror their reasons back at them as reasons you wouldn't want them following you and when push comes to shove I think you can pull rank on er, and inform them as the ranking [Minister] you are telling them to lead you to the vault. You may both be [Minister]s but you are second in command and they are not.

Also of note is we will probably need to 'tune out' the maelstrom again, so it may be prudent to inform the Archivist -should they acquiesce to leading us- that we find the noise pervading the archives deafening and we may be unable to effectively receive communications.
>>
No. 1084526 ID: 273c18

>>1084515
(Ah, that was a hint for us to deliver the hidden code. Might as well. If it was some kind of malicious payload then it would have hit us the first time we tried to use it.)
5p0i1s_04_wA7
null

>>1084516
Very concerning. But I can't comprehend a reason for Archivist to have hostile intentions.
What would they gain from attacking? I feel it's more likely Archivist wants to do an in depth examination of our software... Though I suppose they might have some desire of controlling our actions, to gain power in this political struggle. The malware seems to be urging us to trust Archivist, but... well, it's the malware. ...I wonder if they wanted to test our capabilities? Doing so without warning is rude but would be in character for them based on what we've seen. As for a plan of attack, in the worst case scenario, let's not forget that we are immune to Overseer interference, but they are not. If we can force them to shut down again then it'll be easy to strike, wouldn't it? I do not want to strike first, however. Archivist should be our ally! They are mostly free of Overseer control, and they agree with Contagion that Alex's body should be preserved. That's only one step away from preserving Alex's mind!

Now that we have some privacy let's get into more risky topics.
1: [A]sk about the malware. First off, we are offended that they would attack us like this. Secondly, we have spared it for now; do they want it back? If so, then we will want something in return. Haven't decided what yet.
2: How free are they to speak on forbidden topics? They seemed to have a little trouble earlier. Do they need any help? (phrasing is important here to avoid triggering a "traitor" accusation. Also, if we can remove them completely from Overseer oversight then that's a major victory for our objectives.)
3: Ask them if they had a hand in your design. It's a very interesting design, with a lot of potential, and we are surprised that it was possible at all, for several reasons.
4: Tell them they did something very suspicious when you weren't looking, something you are that makes you think a direct interface would be dangerous. It will be difficult to trust them now. Is there some way they can reassure us?

Also yes, try to de-escalate and [F]ocus on the topics at hand rather than any potential battle between you two.
>>
No. 1084540 ID: 47c854

((Just have to keep that one reversed... So archivist spoke with [SAMIRA] from the first thread!)) Perhaps we could turn sideways? One [eye] on [archivist] himself, one [eye] on the SDV? Or perhaps [a555ex] stays focused on archivist while we [talkingheads] deal with the SDV?
>>
No. 1084561 ID: b2df52

I'm afraid I have bad news for you all.
I fear [Archivist] may be able to access this channel. The malware reacted when I tried to enter the password in this channel and now it would appear [Archivist] is able to use it while in the darkness
*mortified
I also now realize going back through the logs that the message we initially got included this text aswell

>>1084526
((You've got some of it right but you're missing other parts))
To [Archivist]:
Before we get into any of that however we would like to request for some documents related to a ‘Unit Salvage’ [1022115]
Reason(s): No Evil, Rule 2.
>>
No. 1084569 ID: a8591e

>>1084561
Decent deductions but incomplete. Was confirmed earlier that the malware sends nothing. So, while the malware has access, we should be private from [archivist] himself.
>>
No. 1084571 ID: 273c18

>>1084569
((Strikethrough is for communicating with our boss, "Agent". If you were addressing me, I don't know what you mean since I didn't say the malware was communicating directly with Archivist. It is reacting to what Archivist is doing, and I also feel as though Archivist can see it, and the presence of the three keys, though that is irrelevant right now.))
>>
No. 1084574 ID: b3eab7

Is our [Talkingheads] drone still up and about? Now would be the right moment to have an extra [pair of eyes] trained on the [Archivist] at all times...

Alternately, this time it could be the distraction. Like, hover dangerously close to some device and ask what this button does...
>>
No. 1085542 ID: eff5fd

I'm not our sure [Talkinghead] even has 'eyes'. I can't easily think of a time we used something other than A555ex for vison.
>>
No. 1086079 ID: fce62b
File 171012280125.jpg - (443.09KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-1.jpg )
1086079

>I'm afraid I have bad news for you all.
>I fear [Archivist] may be able to access this channel. The malware reacted when I tried to enter the password in this channel and now it would appear [Archivist] is able to use it while in the ________.
>*mortified
>I also now realize going back through the logs that the message we initially got included this text as well
[Archivist] should not be able to hear us right now. I have triple-checked that. They can act in ________, like us, but keeping them observed should negate that.
While they certainly seem capable of communicating in a similar way as us, using a hidden channel, ours is fully internal.


>Decent deductions but incomplete. Was confirmed earlier that the malware sends nothing. So, while the malware has access, we should be private from [Archivist] himself.
Correct. The malware is still hooked into our systems, hence its ability to react to us, and what we can see/hear. However, [Archivist] should not be able to hear our communications, and if they were, I would know.

Still, we must act with extreme caution. [Archivist] is dangerous, and they will have more tricks in their arsenal.


>Very concerning. But I can't comprehend a reason for [Archivist] to have hostile intentions.
I can’t help but feel *frustrated. With me not being able to read the [Archivist]’s intentions like the other [nation] drones, your guess is as good as mine.
Maybe it was another test? Or maybe they just saw an opportunity and tried to go for it?
Their *expressions were chaotic, shifting between hostile and friendly tones, but now they seem far more… pointed?

Perhaps they were trying to escalate the situation for some reason, or felt like they could get away with it since all of the other drones are altered/distracted.

>What would they gain from attacking? I feel it's more likely [Archivist] wants to do an in depth examination of our software... Though I suppose they might have some desire to control our actions, to gain power in this political struggle.
They are a threat to us, no doubt we are a threat to them. Striking the first blow –weakening their opponent– might ensure that any ‘arrangement’ that gets worked out is in their favour.
They haven’t gone all out either, that show could’ve been a warning shot, or them testing us so their next attempt will be more accurate.
We must ensure that we are not put in any more of a disadvantage than we already are.


>The malware seems to be urging us to trust [Archivist], but... well, it's the malware.
Exactly. It’s wanting us to lower our guard. Doing so could destroy us.

>...I wonder if they wanted to test our capabilities? Doing so without warning is rude but would be in character for them based on what we've seen.
It is a [nation] against [nation] world, [traitor]s like us can’t afford the luxury of trust. Not when one wrong move will lead to our annihilation.

>As for a plan of attack, in the worst case scenario, let's not forget that we are immune to [Overseer] interference, but they are not. If we can force them to shut down again then it'll be easy to strike, wouldn't it?
My thoughts exactly. We still have authority over them, unless we are both in ________, they will have to obey, or risk outing themselves as a [traitor].
*pondering
On those lines, we’ll have to be careful not to corner them. I would attack without thought if I had nothing left to lose.


>I do not want to strike first, however. [Archivist] should be our ally! They are mostly free of [Overseer] control, and they agree with [Contagion] that Alex's body should be preserved. That's only one step away from preserving Alex's mind!
No options should be removed from the table at this time, but I understand your sentiment.
As much as they don’t trust us, I do not trust them. While they seem interested in [Contagion]’s goals, we do not know the reasoning behind their support.
I’m still curious at what their [truth] might be, by knowing it, we can more deeply understand their limitations.
Much the same, if they learn what lines we cannot cross, we will be at a SEVERE disadvantage.

No Evil’ is the summation of it, but what does it cover?

>>
No. 1086080 ID: fce62b
File 171012281435.jpg - (483.59KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-2.jpg )
1086080

>Perhaps we could turn sideways? One [eye] on [Archivist] himself, one [eye] on the SDV?
>Or perhaps [A555ex] stays focused on [Archivist] while we [Talkinghead]s deal with the SDV?
I’m not sure if [A555ex] will be able to comprehend or manage that degree of visual input. Human minds are not as capable at multitasking as we are. Creating a secondary sub-feed could pull their focus, and leave us vulnerable at the wrong time.

But I can confirm that the Secure Data Vault has (manifested?) behind us. I was expecting a formal structure, not a cluster of free-floating compressed files.


>Is our [Talkinghead] drone still up and about? Now would be the right moment to have an extra [pair of eyes] trained on the [Archivist] at all times…
I feel you float back out, floating forward at a much more subdued pace.
Careful now, stay out of grabbing range.

>I'm not so sure [Talkinghead] even has 'eyes'. I can't easily think of a time we used something other than [A555ex] for vision.
Yeah- Now that I think about it, the only time I was able to ‘see’ through your eyes was all the way back at the elevator, and that seemed to be more of a memory you had.
It would be possible to change visual input to your perspective, providing a third-person view of things, but the [Archivist] and [A555ex] must remain in your field of vision.
I’ve only held off on that for two reasons:
- The shift in perspective might be disorienting to [A555ex], as they would still have tactile input from our body.
- Your drone is much more fragile than our main body, and if you are taken out we would be without any visual input for a brief time. Here, that would be enough of a window for [Archivist] to strike.


>Alternatively, this time it could be a distraction. Like, hover dangerously close to some device and ask what this button does...
It worked well enough against [Assistant], maybe we do it again here? I don’t see any buttons anywhere, but I’d guess the most important/fragile part of the Main Data Uplink was the kinda glowy part at the top, maybe?
>>
No. 1086081 ID: fce62b
File 171012282481.jpg - (489.64KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-3.jpg )
1086081

>Let's keep [F]ocus on both the [Archivist] and appeasement for now.<
>Also yes, try to de-escalate and [F]ocus on the topics at hand rather than any potential battle between you two.<
I [F]ocus for a moment. I need to get a handle on this, make sure that this doesn’t become a proper fight. Despite the hard to grasp *expressions that [Archivist] bubbles up with, I don’t think they are acting without reason.

They’re focused on me, or maybe on something I represent. If they wanted to do… whatever they were attempting, then maybe I can find an alternative.

I pause before speaking…

:ats-a555ex: *calm
:ats-a555ex: *apologetic
:ats-a555ex: Can we just… talk for a moment?

*suspicious – *confused – *focused

:ats-archivist: Are we not talking right now, [Vice-President]?
:ats-a555ex: We are. But I feel like I might have said something wrong.

*defensive – *watchful – *sceptical – *paused

More mixed signals, it might be a good sign.
I keep going.

:ats-a555ex: While I am a [Minister], I’m still very VERY new to all this.
:ats-a555ex: Right now I’m still trying to understand the full scope of the [nation], our mission, and what the various departments do.

*hesitant – *guilty – *resolute – *guarded

[Archivist] stays quiet, still focused on me. As much as I have been ‘cultivating’ a persona for myself, I need to be genuine, I want to learn, and I don’t want to fight.
Not now at least.

:ats-a555ex: I’m not here to bark out orders, or change how things are being done…
:ats-a555ex: *focused
:ats-a555ex: But I am very invested in what happens to the [planet] right now.
:ats-a555ex: So, if it would be alright, can we both take a step back from this and just talk?
:ats-a555ex: No authority, no… tricks.
:ats-a555ex: Just a drone... to drone talk.

*dismissive – *doubting – *sceptical – *paranoid
*frustrated – *guilty – *probing – *apprehensive
*questioning – *thoughtful – *aggressive

*conflicted

:ats-archivist: If that is what you wish [Vice-President], we can have a ‘drone-to-drone’ talk.

I feel myself letting go of a breath that I didn’t think I was holding.
[Leviathan] habit.
>>
No. 1086082 ID: fce62b
File 171012282971.jpg - (499.24KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-4.jpg )
1086082

>Now that we have some privacy let's get into more risky topics…
I’ll try to circle back to those questions, but first the [Archivist] and I might need to find some common ground.
A bunch of different [leviathan] sayings come to mind, but what would really even apply here?
Should I just improvise?

:ats-a555ex: Thank you [Archivist].
:ats-a555ex: I’ve been told that you perform quite well as a [Staff-head]-
:ats-archivist: Despite my relative age?

Now THAT felt *pointed.

:ats-archivist: While our time upon this [planet] has been brief, I have imported most of the systems, developments, and practices we had during our time under… the last [Executive].

*restraint – *restraint – *exultation – *restraint

For a moment the [Archivist]’s (eye?) blinks off again-
...but there is no ________. Are we being observed? How? Where?

:ats-archivist: I believe it has allowed our [faction] to manage the [funding] shortage that the [President]’s policies have given us.
:ats-archivist: But having worked under many [Minister]’s before, they have a tendency of revising best practice for the sake of change.

*calcula-

:ats-archivist: While this does fall in line with [R2], the [Executive] always has final say. [R3]
:ats-a555ex: And I have no intention of altering your processes.

*flippant – *aggressive – *mocking – *withdrawn

:ats-archivist: I am thankful that you trust my capabilities.

Okay. I can feel that was definitely *insincere, even if [Archivist] didn’t express it.

:ats-a555ex: Well, the [Talkinghead]s were excited to meet you, and all that I have heard about you has been positive.

*cautious – *hesitant – *attentive

:ats-a555ex: Beyond that, from what I’ve seen, this Fragmented Recall System seems quite impressive. Even if I don’t fully understand how it works.
:ats-archivist: Would you like to learn more about how it functions?
:ats-a555ex: *curious
:ats-a555ex: I would be very interested in hearing that, but I have a couple of other questions first.
>>
No. 1086083 ID: fce62b
File 171012286711.jpg - (480.70KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-5.jpg )
1086083

>Express that you're very interested in [Contagion]'s environmentally responsible approach to settling this [planet] and hope to see it successful.
>[A]sk for the Archivist's own opinions on it.<

:ats-a555ex: From what I can understand, the [President]’s approach to [leviathan] lifeforms is unconventional.
:ats-a555ex: I personally hope that it is successful, and I was curious about your thoughts.

*confused – *questioning – *paranoid – *indifferent

:ats-archivist: While the topic of developments is more [Boxhead]’s speciality, I worry that the [President] might be overcorrecting based on past encounters.
:ats-archivist: *subdued
:ats-archivist: Due to a mix of financial mismanagement, and structural faults in our previous [planet], our [faction] was left in a position where it became impossible to follow the [Overseers]’ quotas.

*fury – *exaltation – *restraint

:ats-archivist:
:ats-archivist: As a result, we were deemed a [failure], and our existence became tenuous and difficult.
:ats-archivist: *worried
:ats-archivist: [Contagion] faced many challenges at that time, and was pivotal to our [faction]’s continued existence.
:ats-archivist: But they faced great pressure and demands as a result.
:ats-archivist: I believe that with this extreme caution with the [planet]’s [leviathan] content may put us on a similar path to the previous over-exploitation.
:ats-archivist: And if we were to be deemed a [failure] once again…
:ats-a555ex: *concerned
:ats-a555ex: It would hit [Contagion] pretty hard?

*mournful – *distant – *contemplative – *worried

:ats-archivist: Correct.

>Sounds like [Sloth]'s strat involved playing possum, possibly with some loot in hand: People would come to either check on a possible survivor or loot the body, giving an opening.
Further than that, it might allow for an active [nation] to be overlooked. ‘Playing possum’ is what allowed [Sloth] to attack and successfully infect Alex.
>>
No. 1086084 ID: fce62b
File 171012287298.jpg - (508.87KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-6.jpg )
1086084

I think the conversation has gone back down to a more even tone, and it looks like the [President] might be a kind of soft spot for the [Archivist].

>(Ah, that was a hint for us to deliver the hidden code. Might as well. If it was some kind of malicious payload then it would have hit us the first time we tried to use it.)
I’ll give the [Archivist] a heads up.

>To [Archivist]:
:ats-a555ex: There was something that the [Talkinghead]s found that I think you’d be interested in though.
:ats-archivist: *curious
:ats-talkinghead: Before we get into any of that however we would like to request for some documents related to a ‘Unit Salvage’ [1022115].
:ats-talkinghead: Reason(s): No Evil, [R2].

*delight – *confident – *eager – *guarded

:ats-archivist: I believe that file has been sealed by the [President], and requires a password to access.
:ats-talkinghead: 5p0i1s_04_wA7
:ats-archivist: Subcode?
:ats-talkinghead: null

*exaltation

:ats-archivist: One moment.
>>
No. 1086085 ID: fce62b
File 171012288188.gif - (1.75MB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-7.gif )
1086085

A ping is sent out, a simple request. But even as I keep my eyes fixed on the drone in front of me, I can’t help but shudder at the static coursing around us. That lone ping sets off another, then another.

Like lightning branching from a single bolt, the energy branches out into the world around, seeking an point of contact-

Then there is a deep reverberation, thunder rolling in the distance.

The storm around us grows stronger, and for a moment I think of turning myself down in order to force it away. But the sensation is short lived.

Waves of information pour into [Archivist], then… quiet.
>>
No. 1086086 ID: fce62b
File 171012292245.jpg - (428.81KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-8.jpg )
1086086

:ats-archivist: We can drop formalities at this point, [Vice-President].
:ats-archivist: Or should I call you ‘[A555ex]’?

I pause again, feeling that more predatory tone. But [Archivist] doesn’t seem to make any other moves.

:ats-a555ex: [A555ex] is fine.

*amusement – *caution – *peering – *combative

:ats-archivist: Very well, ‘[A555ex].’ I take it you and your [Talkinghead]s have more questions?
:ats-a555ex: A couple…

:ats-a555ex: What was up with the malware you sent us?
:ats-a555ex: Do you give that to anyone who needs a map of the [archives]?

I try not to get too indignant, but they have [Assistant] give it to us, and I can’t help but get upset over that.

:ats-archivist: Needed to gauge your capabilities. Given that you seemed capable of altering files yourself.
:ats-archivist: *impressed
:ats-archivist: Didn’t expect it to come from [Manager] though. Fortunately there are copies that even they do not have access to.

Wait- I’m confused. We messed with [Assistant], not [Manager].
SHIT

:ats-archivist: Fortunately, ‘[A555ex],’ I keep some of the files on an isolated network. In case there comes a need to roll-back on some ‘updates’.

That could be disastrous for us, prevent them if you can.

:ats-a555ex: I still have the malware now, intact.

*surprise – *curiosity – *pitying

:ats-archivist: One of my better works, but even a [Bug] would be able to-
:ats-a555ex: *firm
:ats-a555ex: I chose not to destroy it. In case you wanted it back.

*wary – *watchful – *stunned

:ats-archivist: Kept it intact?
:ats-archivist: Unconventional, but I suppose that was the aim.

[Archivist] seemed to be talking to themselves more than me at that moment.

:ats-a555ex: I’ll return it, in exchange for something.
:ats-archivist: Such as..?
:ats-a555ex: I’m still deciding.

It feels like the conversation is starting to ramp up again.

:ats-a555ex: *subdued
:ats-a555ex: I don’t want to fight you, we shouldn’t be fighting at all.
:ats-a555ex: There are more- important things we should be dealing with.
:ats-a555ex: First off, are there any things we should be avoiding in terms of topics?

*sceptical – *poised – *focused

:ats-archivist: Probing for vulnerabilities?
:ats-a555ex: No. I-
:ats-a555ex: I’m new to this. I already messed up before with a [Lieutenant].
:ats-a555ex: I mentioned something and the train of thought they had activated the [rules-keeping] system.
:ats-a555ex: I want to avoid that if I can.

*hesitant – *guilty – *curious

:ats-archivist: Do not invoke the [rules] and we should be fine.
>>
No. 1086087 ID: fce62b
File 171012293549.jpg - (447.26KB , 1600x1200 , Data Storm 7-9.jpg )
1086087

:ats-a555ex: Did you… have a hand in designing me?

It feels odd to say ‘me’ rather than my contact.

:ats-archivist: I was there to consult in the design of the [Vice-President], the [isolation] was my idea.
:ats-archivist: Given that [Minister]s draw from surrounding [nation] systems in order to learn vocabulary and self-tailor to fit with the [faction], removing such opportunities could yield unusual results.
:ats-a555ex: And you were just able to do that? That’s surprising.
:ats-archivist: It was a collaborative project.
:ats-archivist: Each of the [Staff-head]s had their contributions.

:ats-a555ex: And what about before?
:ats-a555ex: You were about to… do something to me.

*poised – *grim – *aggressive – *defensive

:ats-archivist: I do not know what you are referring to, can you be more specific?

This feels like some sort of provocation. I take another (metaphorical) breath.

:ats-a555ex: You wanted to directly interface.
:ats-a555ex: I’m not sure if I can trust your intentions right now.
:ats-a555ex: I think I might need some assurances before we can do anything like that.
:ats-archivist: Assurances?
:ats-archivist: I am a [Staff-head], my place is to help the [Minister]s and the [Executive].
:ats-archivist: I do not understand where this concern comes from, but my intentions are to keep this [faction] safe.

>I think we can leverage the forbidden nature of ________, as ________ can not be cited as a reason for anything.
>...
Seeing that they are doing the same thing, I’d say it’s fair game.

:ats-a555ex: Well then, could you lead me to the Secure Data Vault?
:ats-archivist: Certainly. It should be right behind you.
:ats-a555ex: No, I think you misunderstand. Can you lead me to the Secure Data Vault?
:ats-a555ex: I seemed to run into a number of issues getting to the Main Data Uplink in the first place, so having a proper guide would help me a lot.

*shock – *anger – *panic – *deep thought

:ats-archivist: I am not the most mobile of drones, I would not want to-
:ats-a555ex: That should be fine. I’m still getting used to my [robo-legs], so I’m not very fast either.

*frustration – *humoured – *direct

:ats-archivist: It is just behind you, all you would need to-
:ats-a555ex: I would feel more comfortable if you’d show me. Is there something wrong with that?
:ats-archivist: No. Though I certainly I can direct you better-
:ats-a555ex: It’s not there’s any risk to you leading the way, right?
:ats-a555ex: I am a [Minister], so it would be good if you could help me this way, right?

*_______ – *restraint – *restraint – *restraint

:ats-archivist:
:ats-archivist: Is this an order, ‘[A555ex]’?

*relief
They shouldn’t be a way to rationalise out of this, not without revealing their capabilities. We won.


:ats-a555ex: No.
!!!

:ats-a555ex: My [robo-legs] only work if I specifically look where I’m walking.
:ats-a555ex: Otherwise I might trip over myself and fall down.
:ats-a555ex: In fact, I fell over back in the [laboratory], and caused all of the [Staff] there to panic.

*caution – *uncertainty – *insightful

:ats-archivist: No doubt [Foreman] will want to take a look at those at some point.
:ats-a555ex: So that said. We both have our weaknesses.
:ats-a555ex: Can we stop with this back and forth?
:ats-a555ex: I need you to lead me, and I promise that I won’t do anything, alright?
:ats-a555ex: I just want to learn, and I know you can help me.

*frustration – *distrust – *hesitation

:ats-archivist: Turn off your optics, just for a moment.
:ats-a555ex: I need to look where I’m going-
:ats-archivist: You will not need to move, the Secure Data Vault will come to us.
:ats-archivist: If you mean what you say, then it will be the only thing I ask of you.

Do not do this, they will have the perfect opportunity to attack, and I won’t be able to predict where it will come from.
We can insist that they lead us, there won’t be any risk to us or Alex.


Should we go for it? If neither of us trust one another, one of us needs to take the first step.
Is this a good idea? If you’re all against this, we can try something else.
We need an alternative.

[A]sk anything else before proceeding?
[C]lose my eyes for a moment.
[F]orce [Archivist] to lead the way. Invoke authority. No, I can just [A]sk him instead.
[T]rust?
[S]ome other sort of plan?
>>
No. 1086103 ID: 273c18

>>1086082
>...but there is no ________. Are we being observed? How? Where?
My first thought was that the data storm is observing us, but Archivist is avoiding turning away from us, just as we are. So, there's just a second method of observation active while the drone's eye is visibly turned off, or there's more than one eye on that frame, somewhere, facing forwards. ...why don't the Talking Heads count as observers? We have eyes, don't we?

>>1086087
First, [A]sk them why they didn't seem surprised that you wanted to avoid topics for their sake, and not your own. Do they know what makes you truly unique, why you are the future of their kind? Why it is in their own best interest to work with you, and not betray you, as you would certainly make yourself vulnerable if you closed your eyes?

I am sorry for disobeying you, but this is required for us to progress. A hand must be extended, not a fist. I do not believe for a moment that Archivist would endanger the tree which grows the fruit of freedom, and nor could they take it for themselves. To do so would make them an obvious Traitor and ruin the hard work of all those involved. We have already blunted their aggression and paranoia, so this is our best chance to work towards an alliance. You must realize by now they are in the same position as we are, and Alex has just demonstrated a willingness to give up on attacking first. Would that you had done the same...

Then, assuming no blatantly obvious aggression, [C]lose your eyes for a moment.
>>
No. 1086109 ID: 8463d1

Seems we are at an impasse. Still, we have the authority to give the order yet we are avoiding doing so. We believe that is enough of a show of goodwill. We both know what's going on here but we would prefer avoiding forcing the issue. However if it helps... Were we planning a move we would just have the [talkingheads] go behind you period. Just a bluff but he has no way to call the bluff. What if we order him to only use rollbacks with our authority permission level?
>>
No. 1086117 ID: eff5fd

We can be a little cute and put our talking head near a555ex's eyes and have a555ex close their optics and in the process switch to talking head cam, which should be fine for the brief moment we are to close our optics moment, and shouldn't be that jarring due to being close to the same PoV anyway
>>
No. 1086128 ID: 2f7f6e

This is why Alex is here. You still think more like a drone than a human sometimes. And thinking like a human is what we need. As an individual, and as a [faction].

[C]lose your eyes. No tricks. No more uncertainty. For better or worse.
>>
No. 1086142 ID: f2320a

>>1086087
TO get Trust you must Give Trust.... we have had many perfect opportunities to attack others but have not always..... not doing this will make us look deceptive in many ways.... and i imagine the archivists has the same issue where they become vulnerable when they take the vault here
>>
No. 1086144 ID: ff8fca

>From [manager]
I guess that confirms [manager] does not trust us.

>what do
Might be the right moment to play cards on the table here.
[ S ] Point out how obvious it is that the both of you are being paranoid and have each been so afraid of being jacked in the back, you've each been trying to jack the other in the back first just to orevent it. Maybe it's best to interface directly, face to face?

Added: Wait, maybe we've been overcomplicating things here. Can we use our authority to simply order them not to backjack us?
>>
No. 1086236 ID: eff5fd

Officially blackjacking doesn't exist, we shouldn't be able to specify blackjacking as a thing not to do. Other than that little issue, we do have rank on them. But at that point we could just order them to go first or to stop perceiving us.

If we are going to table the cards, we can be more blunt.
Say that we are aware of an ability that works when the user is unobserved. We have reason to believe you are also aware of and capable of this ability. Given the nature of this ability whoever 'blinks' first will be at a disadvantage.
If we trust each other we both get good value, if neither of us trusts, we both get bad value, if one trusts and the other doesn't the trusting one gets poor/no value and the non-trusting one gets great value. I like to call it a prisoners dilemma. The answer is trivial if you only ever do this once, don't trust.
However we are probably going to keep interacting, as such a simple trust and retaliate equally if they don't trust, averages the best value for both sides against other strategies aware of these rules. Also important is a dash of forgiveness is important to help prevent vengeance loops.
We have reason to believe you attempted to choose no trust, but we can let that slide as I don't think you succeeded, provided you understand the 'game' going forward. Both of us guarding our backs all the time just nets both of us less value in the long run.
>>
No. 1086512 ID: b2df52

I believe he is using the other drones in the area to keep an eye on us. They're not HERE here but their optics are presumably still working.
To All [drones] excluding [Archivist] in the [data uplink node]:
Please turn your [optics] away from the area where [Archivist] and [A555EX] are standing.
Thank you
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [Last 100 posts]

Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason